News Direct

Author:

  • Majority of Canadians still looking to book that summer vacation

    Majority of Canadians still looking to book that summer vacation

    Everyone wants to make the most of their summer – whatever that means to them. It could involve more time spent out in the sun, day trips, nights out or vacations. In fact, a new Skyscanner survey reveals 68% of Canadian travellers are still looking to book their summer holidays.

    “It’s not just about where you go but how you plan,” Laura Lindsay, Skyscanner’s travel expert, said in a statement.

    “Canadians are taking a more intentional approach this year, looking to extend every aspect of their time off, from stretching their budget and travel time to staying flexible and exploring more destinations.”

    Travelling further on the Canadian dollar

    The survey highlights a growing trend among Canadian travellers: Stretching their dollars without sacrificing the experience. In fact, 45% say they’re open to choosing destinations where their money goes further, a sign that value is becoming a top priority in vacation planning.

    For many, this shift is influencing how and when they travel. Nearly half (46%) are opting for budget-friendly accommodations, freeing up more funds to spend on experiences that matter, like local tours, food and cultural attractions.

    Canadians are also getting smart about timing. Roughly a third are extending their summer by travelling during the shoulder season — those quieter weeks just before or after peak summer — to sidestep the highest prices and the busiest crowds. And they’re flexible: A majority are willing to shift their travel dates to take advantage of lower fares.

    According to Skyscanner, the most budget-friendly day for Canadians to fly is Friday, with the week of August 25 emerging as the cheapest travel window, ideal for squeezing in a late-summer escape.

    And perhaps most telling of this mindset shift: 76% say they’re open to skipping the tourist hotspots altogether in favour of lesser-known destinations that offer authenticity without the inflated price tags.

    Popular destinations for Canadians

    Given Canadians’ flexibility on their vacation plans, there’s plenty of quality travel options for them both domestically and internationally.

    Of course, prices for flights change daily and you can take advantage of seat sales or by using points from your travel credit card, but currently, the 10 most affordable destinations are:

    • Calgary – flights from $364
    • Halifax – flights from $371
    • Kelowna – flights from $475
    • St. John’s – flights from $553
    • Puerto Vallarta – flights from $557
    • Nassau – flights from $619
    • Montego Bay – flights from $619
    • Charlottetown – flights from $659
    • Castries – flights from $701
    • Buenos Aires – flights from $723

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • Texas lawmakers pass so-called ‘frat house’ bill, stripping cities of power to dictate how many unrelated people can live in one place — but here’s why not everyone is celebrating

    Texas lawmakers pass so-called ‘frat house’ bill, stripping cities of power to dictate how many unrelated people can live in one place — but here’s why not everyone is celebrating

    On April 14, the Texas Senate passed a new bill that prevents cities from placing limits on how many unrelated people can live in a home. The bill passed by a vote of 30 to 1 and has moved onto the Texas House of Representatives.

    Senate Bill 1567, written by Republican State Senator Paul Bettencourt, would apply to university towns like College Station — potentially providing some relief for students looking for housing.

    Don’t miss

    The bill still limits the number of occupants based on health and safety standards. However, the city ordinances that allow only three to four people who aren’t related by blood or family ties in one dwelling would be removed, deeming it the “frat house” bill.

    The bill has drawn praise and criticism from residents, city and state leaders.

    But why was this occupancy bill proposed in the first place, and will it help or hinder residents of the affected locations?

    Reasoning for the bill

    The idea for the bill started when Texas A&M students raised awareness about the occupancy limits that make housing less affordable for students.

    Around 72,000 students attend Texas A&M’s College Station campus, but only 11,000 live on campus. That means thousands of students are left to find off-campus housing, and not all properties are created equal.

    A College Station Existing Conditions report showed that 58% of renters are considered “cost burdened” and that 35% of these renters are “severely cost burdened.”

    That means more than half of the renters in College Town are spending at least 30% of their income on housing, while those who are severely cost burdened are spending more than 50%.

    A&M student representatives argued at the November 7, 2024 Texas Local Government Senate Committee meeting that current ordinance restrictions are driving housing prices up, according to My Aggie Nation. Many students echoed their frustrations, and that housing continues to be a major challenge.

    Senator Paul Bettencourt was present at the meeting and declared the need for action, saying, “We’re gonna have to do something about this,” according to My Aggie Nation.

    He believes that ordinance restrictions force renters into more expensive options and that removing it could help ease the burden for college students.

    As per the bill analysis, Senator Bettencourt also argues that the “ordinances restrict individual property owners and tenants from maximizing the use of a dwelling unit’s potential” and believes that some municipalities that have enforced them engaged in behavior that could be considered “harassment under revised penal code statutes.”

    Supporters of the bill also believe that its passing would help make housing more available and affordable.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Why some are opposed

    Not everyone is happy about the bill passing the Senate and currently moving through the House.

    According to Fox 4 News, Texas Senator Robert Nichols argued the passing of the bill could have negative consequences. Specifically, single-family zoning could disappear as developers aim to drive profits.

    Nichols claims when he was mayor of Jacksonville, Texas, he received many complaints and that cities probably have a valid reason to enforce these occupancy limits.

    At the March 17 hearing of the Texas Senate Committee on Local Government, he said the city had slum lords who would petition “off all these rooms and rent out the rooms” and not to believe that renters are “college kids who are trying to be good neighbors.”

    Some, like a representative from the College Station Association on Neighborhoods, said during the hearing that the bill could mean that investors would snatch up homes, making it harder for families.

    During a March 27 meeting with the House Land and Resource Management Committee, College Station mayor John Nichols also testified against the bill.

    He argued that the city enforces the ordinance because it helps to balance the needs of housing for students and families

    Councilman Bob Yancy concluded with his argument that “stuffing more people into existing properties is not the answer, more housing is.”

    But for now, the fate of housing regulations is unknown until the Texas House casts its vote.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • Bank bundles: Yay or nay, and why?

    Bank bundles: Yay or nay, and why?

    I love to bundle up. And I’m not talking about adding extra layers of clothing when it’s cold outside. I mean that I enjoy saving money when companies offer bundling bonuses or discounts to customers who get more than one product from the same merchant. It’s an especially popular marketing strategy with telecommunications, software and food companies (who hasn’t gotten a Big Mac Value Meal to save money on fries and a beverage?).

    In recent years, Canadian financial institutions have begun to catch on to the popularity of product bundles, offering a wide variety of different packages to encourage customer loyalty, while saving clients money on their banking needs. Here’s a general look at some of the different kinds of multi-product bundles available at various Canadian banks.

    Banking account services/product bundle rebates

    Many banks offer premium, all-in-one bank accounts with a variety of features and products for a set monthly fee that is at a much lower price point than what it would cost if you were to pay for all your transactions individually.

    For example, a bank might offer a premium bank account that charges a monthly $30 fee but features a plethora of products and services that would be much more expensive if paid for individually.

    Possible products and services include things like:

    • A free premium credit card (a savings of $120 yearly)
    • Unlimited daily transactions for things like withdrawals and Interac e-transfers, which often cost at least $1 each
    • A set amount of free bank drafts (which can average $8 or more each)
    • A free safe deposit box (that can cost $60 a year)
    • Overdraft protection (which can cost around $5 a month)
    • Paper chequebooks (approx. $20)

    Just from the above items and services, depending on how often you make withdraws and send Interact e-transfers, you would easily make back the $360 a year that you would pay in monthly fees. Better yet, many banks in Canada will even waive the monthly fee as long as you keep a minimum balance (often ranging between $3000 to $6000) in your account for the full month.

    Lower fee product bundles

    Not all financial institutions offer clients the option of keeping a set minimum amount in an account to avoid monthly fees altogether. Rather, some banks give clients a complete or partial monthly fee rebate based on how many other banking products they have at the bank.

    So, for example, if you pay a monthly account fee of $30, some banks will offer a 30% (or more) fee reduction if you also have a credit card, a mortgage and/or an investment account with them, saving you over $100 a year. (If you are considering getting a mortgage with your bank to enjoy a bundle perk, remember that a long-term relationship with your bank can also get you a better mortgage rate) .

    Family bundles

    Another package that some banks offer is a family bundle. This kind of bonus package allows clients with a specific kind of premium account to invite family members (who live in the same household) to each open their very own separate chequing account and not pay a monthly fee. Given all the fees that chequing accounts are usually subject to at traditional financial institutions, family bundles could save client’s loved ones hundreds of dollars yearly.

    Cash/high-interest rate bonuses

    Some banks know that nothing speaks louder (or encourages brand loyalty more) than a straightforward chunk of money and a high interest rate. That’s why to attract new clients, some financial institutions feature a one-off amount of bonus money and a generous promotional interest rate for opening an account. Some banks also require that clients “bundle up”: open an account and apply for a bank branded credit card to be eligible for a cash/interest rate bonus.

    Not all bundles are created equal

    While a bundle can be a smart way to save on bank fees and enjoy a few nice extras, it’s vital to do your research because not all of them are good deals. Not all banking packages offer unlimited transactions or feature a good interest rate. Generally, for a bundle to be a decent value you need to keep all your money and accounts with one bank (such as savings, chequing, credit cards, etc), which means you can’t shop around with other banks to take advantage of things like better interest rates or bonus promotions.

    Furthermore, keeping several thousand dollars in a bank account to ensure your monthly fees are waived isn’t as attractive as it looks when you consider that your money could be earning anywhere from 3% or more if you invested it in a no-fee or low-fee GIC or investment account.

    It’s hard to overlook these bundling downsides when there are so many safe and user-friendly online banks that don’t charge any fees at all and still offer unlimited transactions and outstanding interest rates on savings and/or chequing accounts. So, before you bundle up, be a greedy consumer and consider all your banking options and how much they really save you. Personally, I’ve found that banking/investing packages from alternative or online banks tend to offer more value than with traditional banks.

    Final word

    Though terms and conditions vary from bank to bank, doing your research on bundles could end up saving you money and headaches. The convenience of your finances being managed in one place offers peace of mind, but also knowing that you made the smartest choice by bundling because it saves you money, or gets you better rates for other products from your bank, is a satisfaction you cannot beat.

    Ask your bank, or friends who bank at other places, and see if there is a bundle package, similar to those mentioned in this article, that could be relevant to you.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • Barbara Corcoran singled out this US city as the top hotspot she’d choose to open a business. Why the mogul finds it so attractive — and how you, too, can find a budding market

    Barbara Corcoran singled out this US city as the top hotspot she’d choose to open a business. Why the mogul finds it so attractive — and how you, too, can find a budding market

    Barbara Corcoran, a successful real estate entrepreneur and one of the personalities behind the popular TV show Shark Tank, has revealed what city she would choosesaid that if she were to start over again today, she would choose Pittsburgh as the city where she would build a business.

    In an interview with The School of Hard Knocks posted to YouTube on March 10, Corcoran noted an influx of industries into the city, including technology and health care, and referred to Pittsburgh as “a young New York.”

    Don’t miss

    Aside from the perks she mentioned, Pittsburgh has a lot going for it due to its proximity to resources, tax benefits and draw for employees.

    Let’s take a look at why the place nicknamed “Steel City” is so attractive for businesses, and how you can find other budding markets.

    Why Pittsburgh is attractive for businesses

    Corcoran mentioned in the same interview that Pennsylvania has a business-friendly state government, and she’s right.

    With the passing of bill HB 1342 in 2022, the state corporate net income tax rate was lowered from 9.99% to 8.99% starting in 2023. The rate will be further reduced by 0.5% per year until 2031, when it will reach 4.99%. Pennsylvania, previously among the states with the highest corporate tax rates, will eventually have some of the lowest in the country.

    Pittsburgh, the state’s second-largest city, is also well-located. Half of the U.S. population lives within 500 miles of the Steel City. This can give businesses better access to supplies or vendors and even current and future customers. The city also has a robust labor force of around 1.29 million people in the area.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Employees will find Pittsburgh to be highly livable, with typical home values sitting around $240,000, according to Zillow, lower than its national estimated average of around $367,000.

    Some of Pittsburgh’s other notable features include outdoor amenities, a large number of regional post secondary educational institutions and cultural attractions, which could lure employees to come and work for your business.

    What about small businesses in Pittsburgh?

    Many of the incentives mentioned are likely to benefit larger corporations or ones with more resources to invest. But there are still benefits for smaller businesses that may be considering opening up shop in Pittsburgh.

    The Pennsylvania Business One-Stop Shop is a resource the state created to help small businesses launch and grow their company. It can help you set up the correct business entity and access.

    If Pittsburgh isn’t for you, other locations offer perks for business owners.

    In 2024, CNBC analyzed all 50 states based on 128 metrics in 10 categories and ranked them based on which was best for businesses. The top five included Virginia, North Carolina, Texas, Georgia and Florida.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • Tech giant Nvidia’s market shake-up: What investors should know — and do — after the $277 billion drop

    Tech giant Nvidia’s market shake-up: What investors should know — and do — after the $277 billion drop

    Nvidia Corporation, a titan in the semiconductor industry, has recently experienced significant fluctuations in its market valuation, underscoring the volatile nature of the technology sector. In January 2025, the company faced an unprecedented single-day market capitalization loss of approximately $600 billion, primarily due to emerging competition from Chinese startup DeepSeek. Despite this setback, Nvidia’s strategic initiatives and robust demand for its artificial intelligence (AI)-driven products suggest a resilient trajectory.

    The DeepSeek disruption

    On January 27, 2025, Nvidia’s stock plummeted by 16.5%, erasing nearly US$277 billion in market capitalization — one of the largest single-day losses in the history of U.S. equity markets. This dramatic decline was triggered by DeepSeek’s announcement of an advanced AI model that operates efficiently with less computing power, challenging Nvidia’s dominance in AI hardware. The market’s reaction was swift, reflecting concerns over Nvidia’s future competitiveness.

    Strategic responses and market recovery

    In the wake of this disruption, Nvidia has undertaken several strategic measures to reaffirm its market position. The company introduced the Blackwell AI chip, designed to meet the escalating demands of AI applications. However, the stock’s performance remained subdued, trading sideways as investors awaited tangible results from this new offering.

    "Despite shipping the Blackwell chip, Nvidia’s stock has been trading sideways, and analysts suggest it might need more than a strong earnings report to rejuvenate momentum," Investor’s Business Daily reported. Since unveiling the new Blackwell GPU architecture in early March 2024, Nvidia’s stock has rebounded modestly. Analysts now expect the Blackwell series — designed to outperform Hopper chips in AI inference workloads — to play a pivotal role in regaining market momentum in the second half of 2025.

    Further bolstering its prospects, Nvidia secured a significant contract with South Korea, which announced plans to acquire 10,000 Nvidia GPUs for a national AI computing centre, indicating robust international demand for Nvidia’s products beyond the U.S. tech market. Barron’s highlighted this development, by explaining that "the stock recovery is bolstered by positive developments, such as South Korea’s announcement to acquire 10,000 Nvidia GPUs for a national AI computing center, indicating strong demand beyond U.S. tech companies."

    Financial performance and future outlook

    Nvidia’s financial metrics reflect its resilience amidst market turbulence. In the third quarter of 2024, the company reported a 109% increase in net income to US$19.3 billion, with quarterly sales rising by 94% year-over-year to US$35.1 billion. In its latest earnings report, Nvidia posted Q4 FY2025 revenue of US$22.1 billion, up 265% year-over-year, with data centre revenue soaring to $18.4 billion — a clear indicator of sustained global demand for AI infrastructure.

    The Times reported, "Nvidia, the leading American chipmaker, reported a 109% rise in net income to $19.3 billion for Q3 2024, surpassing analysts’ expectations amidst tremendous AI-driven demand for their chips."

    Despite these positive indicators, Nvidia faces challenges, including increased competition and potential regulatory hurdles. The company’s ability to innovate and adapt will be crucial in maintaining its leadership position in the AI hardware market. As the technology landscape evolves, Nvidia’s strategic decisions in product development and market expansion will significantly influence its future performance.

    Bottom line

    While Nvidia has encountered notable market volatility, its proactive strategies and sustained demand for AI technologies position it well for recovery and growth. Investors and industry observers will keep a close eye on how Nvidia navigates these challenges in the dynamic semiconductor sector.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • ‘Beyond the pale’: Atlanta ‘phantom debt collector’ harassed people into paying him debts they didn’t owe — here’s how to protect yourself from being ‘violated’ by shady professionals

    ‘Beyond the pale’: Atlanta ‘phantom debt collector’ harassed people into paying him debts they didn’t owe — here’s how to protect yourself from being ‘violated’ by shady professionals

    Having debt is never fun. And when a representative from a lender calls you asking for the amount you owe, your nerves may get the best of you.

    But what if you’re being harassed? Worse yet, for a debt you don’t really owe?

    Don’t miss

    Kenneth Redon III, a former debt collector who owned Global Circulation, Inc. (GCI), has been barred for life from the debt collection business after harassing a number of individuals to pay debts that didn’t exist, according to a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) release.

    But this isn’t a new scam. Back in 2023, Sherrel Dunn was a victim of the same scheme.

    “You just feel violated,” she told WSB-TV. “You feel helpless.”

    More about the ‘phantom debt collector’

    According to the FTC release, Redon “threatened consumers with jail time, lawsuits, and wage garnishments to pressure them into paying debt they didn’t actually owe.”

    WSB-TV spoke to FTC Senior Attorney Gregory Ashe about the tactics Redon used.

    In addition to assuming a number of false names, he also called his victims multiple times a week, sometimes calling several times a day.

    Ashe also said “in many instances [Redon] had some forms of the consumer’s personal information. And so they would say, ‘is this not the last four digits of your Social Security number?’”

    Redon’s company allegedly claimed the business was affiliated with certain lenders to further trick borrowers into paying their phantom debts.

    The FTC’s release also states it filed a temporary restraining order against GCI and said Redon violated parts of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

    Under the FTC’s proposed order, GCI and Redon also have a monetary judgment of $9,684,338 imposed, but this will be suspended once any remaining assets are turned over. However, if Redon and his company are found to have misled or lied about their business finances, then the judgment remains in effect.

    “Using a playbook of intimidation and threats of jail time to coerce consumers into paying debts that they don’t owe is beyond the pale,” said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection in the same press release. “The FTC will not hesitate to act against phantom debt collectors to shut down their operations.”

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Knowing your rights

    The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau says the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act prevents debt collection companies from contacting you during certain hours. They are forbidden from abusing, harassing or making misleading statements to individuals who owe debts.

    As an example, a debt collector is not allowed to call or contact you repeatedly, especially with the intention of threatening or annoying you. Debt collectors are required to identify themselves and can’t call before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m.

    If you’re on the phone with a debt collector or have received a letter, you have a right to know how much you supposedly owe and what the debt is for. You can also dispute the debt or verify whether the debt is actually yours.

    Even if the debt is legitimate, you still have a right to take some space and ask the debt collector to stop contacting you. That doesn’t mean you don’t owe the debt, though, they’ll just take another legal approach.

    How to spot a shady debt collector

    A major red flag is if a debt collector refuses to tell you the name of the lender you allegedly owe, or if the collector is vague about their own identity or the amount owed. Get as much information as you can in writing to ensure the claim is real. If someone calls you and refuses to provide written documentation, then they’re most likely a scammer.

    Remember, you have the right to ask the debt collector for information about the original lender, assuming the debt was transferred to another company. If a person calls you saying that they are a collector and tries to threaten you or to confirm sensitive information (like your Social Security number), hang up and contact the alleged debt collection company yourself to see if it’s legitimate.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • At 65 and set to retire with $357,000 in the bank: How much money can you comfortably spend each year?

    At 65 and set to retire with $357,000 in the bank: How much money can you comfortably spend each year?

    John spent the last 30 years working. Unfortunately, he didn’t save. To be honest, John only started saving over the last 15 years. Despite some obstacles, John managed to put away approximately $357,000. Now he’s a year away from celebrating his 65th birthday and he wants to know: Can I retire?

    John isn’t alone. Across the country, many Canadians approach retirement with more questions than answers. What plagues most of these pre-retirees are the same questions:

    • Have I saved enough for retirement?
    • How long will my savings last?

    For people like John, a good place to start is to work backwards. Here’s how to do it.

    Start with the basics: What the average Canadian retiree household looks like

    The average Canadian retiree household (assumed to be over the age of 65) spends roughly $62,000 per year, according to a 2021 report from Statistics Canada. This means retired couples can expect to pay roughly $5,200 per month on housing costs, groceries, transportation and moderate entertainment (such as hobbies, seeing friends and gifts for families).

    With this figure in mind, each spouse contributes about $31,000 per year or $2,600 per month to pay for living expenses, once they retire.

    The good news is that most working Canadians can expect some help from government sources.

    For instance, the average monthly Canada Pension Plan (CPP) payment for a retiree was $815 in 2024, according to Government of Canada data. Plus, most Canadian retirees can expect an income supplement through Old Age Security (OAS) of approximately $654 to $1,087, depending on their marital status and retirement income.

    Based on these averages, most Canadian retirees can expect government income supplements to provide between $1,400 to $1,900 in monthly income. This works out to $16,800 to $22,800 per year per person — or $33,600 to $45,600 for a couple.

    Using these supplements, you can now work backwards:

    • $5,200: What you need to budget for expenses, each month
    • $1,400 to $1,900: What you can expect from government pension and income supplements, each month
    • $3,300 to $3,800: Shortfall each month

    Based on these calculations, the nest egg of $357,000 would need to provide between $3,300 and $3,800 in income each month. Split these costs with a partner and you may reduce the monthly income from your savings portfolio to $1,650 to $1,900 per month in investment income.

    But is this nest egg large enough for the retirement you are envisioning?

    To get a good idea if your savings nest egg is large enough, you can examine where you stand in comparison with your peers.

    Compare savings with the average Canadian retiree

    StatsCan data shows the average Canadian aged 65 or older has approximately $517,000 in retirement savings, including private pension assets, employer-sponsored pensions, RRSP and non-pension assets.

    From this perspective, John’s savings of $357,000 appear a bit low, but it’s a solid start towards a comfortable retirement.

    Plan for longevity

    The World Health Organization (WHO) pegs average life expectancy in Canada at 82 years — meaning that retirees starting this next phase of their life at age 65 should plan for 17 years of retirement living.

    If John were to plan for a conservative 20-year retirement, then your $357,000 nest egg would need to provide $17,850 in income per year, ignoring any investment growth.

    Calculate how long your money will last

    The “4% rule” is a common guideline for retirement withdrawals. Using this rule, retirees should withdraw no more than 4% of the portfolio’s value — ensuring that the bulk of the principal continues to accrue interest, earnings and dividends that are then used to fund another year of retirement living.

    How much can John comfortably spend in retirement?

    Using the 4% rule, John could withdraw up to $14,280 in the first year. When combined with the average income generated from government pension and income-supplement plans, John would have approximately $34,500 in income.

    If John had a spouse that could also contribute a similar amount, there would be no need to worry; however, if John is single and must pay for all living expenses out of his own retirement earnings, he is going to have problems.

    Recall that the average retiree spends about $62,000 on living expenses — with each spouse contributing approximately $31,000 to cover these costs. Unfortunately, John doesn’t have enough to cover the full amount, which means he will need to consider ways to cut down on expenses.

    Worried about your finances? How to stretch your savings

    Even with a strong start at saving, there are always ways to bulk up your nest egg. To help, here are five strategies to make sure your retirement savings last.

    • Make your money work for you: Inflation, alone, will eat away at your purchasing power so it’s critical that you stash your nest egg in accounts that will let your money work for you. For instance, store these funds in a day-to-day account, like a chequing account, and the minimal interest earnings won’t even cover the cost of inflation. Instead, keep the bulk of your savings in an investment portfolio (using a trading account with low fees). Additionally, you can keep emergency funds in a high-interest savings account.

    • Minimize taxes using registered plans and strategic withdrawals: Make use of TFSAs and RRSPs to legally shield yourself from paying more tax. When you get to retirement, be strategic about where you withdraw money — as some withdrawals will add to taxable income in retirement, while others will not. In general, withdrawals from your TFSA will not increase taxable income and prompt any clawbacks in government supplements, such as OAS. RRSP withdrawals, however, are taxable and will increase your taxable income in retirement.

    • Downsize your home or relocate: Shelter costs often make up the largest retirement expense — and it’s not just about the mortgage or rent payment. Heating and electricity bills can add up if your home is larger than your needs. To help reduce these costs, consider downsizing to a smaller property. If you don’t have familial or friendship ties keeping you in one place, consider relocating to a less expensive city or region. This can also help free up some extra cash that can be used to supplement your retirement savings.

    • Part-time income: While not all retirees want to work in retirement, some choose to while others must. If you’re in this position, keep in mind that any additional income can supplement your savings, help you delay collecting CPP and OAS and help give you peace of mind.

    • Delay CPP and OAS if possible: For every year that you delay CPP after age 65, you can expect your payment to increase by 8.4% per year (up to age 70). OAS benefits also rise commensurately by 7.2% for each year you delay. If you don’t need the money right away, a delay in collecting these income supplments can help boost your monthly income in later years.

    Bottom line

    With $357,000 in savings and steady income from CPP and OAS, your financial outlook has a solid start, but there’s work to be done. If you decide not to work and not to delay your CPP and OAS earnings, you can budget approximately $34,000 per year available to pay expenses — and this should last until your savings are depleted in about 20 years.

    By fusing smart withdrawal strategies and careful budgeting, there is no doubt you can enjoy a comfortable retirement.

    To stretch savings even further, consider downsizing, part-time work or optimizing your investments.

    Remember: retirement isn’t just about how much you have but how you use it.

    — with files from Justin Ho

    Sources

    1. Statistics Canada: Household spending by age of reference person (Oct 18, 2023)

    2. Government of Canada: Canada Pension Plan: Pensions and benefits monthly amounts

    3. Government of Canada: Old Age Security pension and benefits

    4. Statistics Canada: Assets and debts held by economic family type, by age group, Canada, provinces and selected census metropolitan areas, Survey of Financial Security (x 1,000,000) (Oct 29, 2024)

    5. WHO: Canada (Health data overview for Canada)

    6. Forbes: What Is The 4% Rule For Retirement Withdrawals? (Feb 19, 2023)

    7. Government of Canada: When to start your retirement pension

    8. Government of Canada: When to start receiving OAS

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • U.S. Senate passes ‘No Tax on Tips’ bill as Canada grapples with tipping fatigue and new rules

    U.S. Senate passes ‘No Tax on Tips’ bill as Canada grapples with tipping fatigue and new rules

    As tipping practices come under renewed scrutiny across North America, the U.S. Senate has voted to exempt thousands of workers from paying income tax on their tips — a move that comes just weeks after Quebec introduced new laws to rein in aggressive tipping prompts on payment terminals.

    For Canadians, the moment offers a chance to reflect on how tipping culture has evolved, and how the lines between social courtesy, economic necessity and tax policy have increasingly blurred. From rising expectations to tip in fast food restaurants to pressure at checkout terminals, the shift in tipping norms is now a key part of how people budget, spend and earn in the service economy.

    U.S. bill could eliminate income tax on up to $25K in tips

    On May 20, the U.S. Senate unanimously passed the “No Tax on Tips Act,” a bipartisan bill that would exempt up to US$25,000 in annual tips from federal income taxes. The proposal, originally introduced by Republican Senator Ted Cruz and co-sponsored by Democrats Jacky Rosen and Catherine Cortez Masto, targets workers in traditionally tipped industries, from restaurant staff to hair stylists.

    To qualify, workers would need to earn less than US$160,000 per year and report their tips to their employer, ensuring payroll taxes are still withheld. If passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, the bill could take effect in 2026.

    Senator Cruz called tipping “a great American tradition” and argued that workers should be able to keep more of what they earn. “Tips belong to the workers who earn them — not the IRS,” he said during a press conference.

    Democratic co-sponsors emphasized that the bill supports low- and middle-income workers, many of whom rely on tips to make ends meet. Still, some U.S. policy analysts cautioned that exempting tipped income could reduce eligibility for income-based benefits like Social Security or the Earned Income Tax Credit, since those programs are tied to reported income.

    Quebec cracks down on tipping calculated after tax

    While the U.S. moves to reduce the tax burden on tipped workers, Canada’s most recent tipping legislation has focused on the moment of transaction, not taxation.

    As of May 7, 2025, Quebec has made it illegal for businesses to present tipping options based on the total after-tax amount. Under Bill 72, tipping prompts must now be calculated on the pre-tax subtotal, and businesses cannot pre-select tip amounts or use persuasive language at checkout.

    The move comes amid growing public frustration over so-called "tip creep," the expectation to tip more, and in more places, than ever before. An Angus Reid poll from 2023 found that 83% of Canadians believe tipping culture has gotten out of hand, particularly with tip prompts now showing up at self-serve kiosks and fast food counters.

    Under Quebec’s new rules, a 15% tip on a $100 meal is now required to be based on the pre-tax amount, resulting in a $15 tip rather than $17.25 if it were calculated on the after-tax total.

    The legislation also empowers Quebec’s consumer protection office to enforce compliance, with potential fines of up to $100,000 for businesses that fail to follow the rules.

    How tips are taxed and reported in Canada

    In Canada, tips are considered taxable income. According to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), tips must be included on your tax return and may affect your entitlement to federal benefits and credits.

    There are two categories of tips:

    • Controlled tips: These are tips that are pooled, distributed or managed by the employer (such as tips added to a credit card bill and distributed later). Employers are required to include these in your T4 slip.
    • Direct tips: These are tips received directly from customers (such as cash left on the table). Workers must track and report these themselves.

    CRA requires workers to report both controlled and direct tips as part of their total income.

    In Quebec, the rules go further. Employees working in specific service-sector jobs must declare all tips to their employer daily, and these tips are included in payroll calculations for vacation pay, pension contributions and other employment standards. The provincial tax agency, Revenu Québec, enforces compliance through mandatory declarations and employer reporting.

    Failing to report tip income can lead to audits, reassessments, penalties or interest charges.

    Tipping fatigue is real — and Canadians are feeling it

    Canadians are tipping more often, and in more places, than ever before. A combination of post-pandemic service industry struggles, inflation and the proliferation of digital payment terminals has shifted tipping from a gesture of thanks to an expected part of almost every transaction.

    According to Angus Reid, nearly half of Canadians now say they feel “pressured” to tip — especially when presented with preset options of 18%, 20% or even 25%. Many have also expressed confusion about whether tipping is mandatory, particularly in businesses that already charge service fees or where staff are paid above minimum wage.

    These concerns are what spurred Quebec’s legislative action, and could prompt other provinces, and possibly our neighbours to the south, to follow suit.

    For now, there is no Canada-wide policy on how tips should be presented or calculated at checkout. But as consumers grow more skeptical of rising tip expectations, there is increasing momentum for a clearer, more consistent approach.

    What Canadian consumers and workers should know

    Tipping might feel like a simple gesture, a few extra dollars to show appreciation, but whether you’re leaving one or earning one, there’s more at stake than you might think.

    For consumers, it’s important to remember that tip suggestions on payment terminals are just that: suggestions. You’re not obligated to choose one of the preset options, and you can always enter your own amount, or none at all. These tipping prompts, often set at 18%, 20% or even 25%, can feel like pressure rather than a choice. And if you’re in Quebec, a new law now requires that tip suggestions be based on the pre-tax amount, not the total after taxes.

    Also, keep an eye on your receipt. Some restaurants or services may already include a gratuity, especially for large groups. If that’s the case, you don’t need to tip twice, unless you truly want to.

    For workers in tipped industries, the rules are clear: tips are taxable income. That means whether you get them in cash, on a card or through a pooled system at your workplace, they need to be reported. The Canada Revenue Agency expects all tip income to be included on your tax return, and in Quebec, that declaration must happen daily if you work in a regulated establishment like a bar or restaurant.

    While it might be tempting to underreport, especially when tips are handed to you directly, doing so can affect more than just your taxes. Accurately reporting tips can help boost your eligibility for employment insurance, the Canada Pension Plan and other income-based benefits down the line. Tracking your tips carefully, and reporting them honestly, is one of the best ways to protect your financial future.

    In the end, the rules around tipping, whether at the table, at the till or on your tax return, are changing quickly. As governments across North America take a closer look at how tips are earned, taxed and presented, both consumers and workers would be wise to pay closer attention too. Whether it’s resisting pressure from a payment screen or making sure tip income is accurately reported, being informed can help you make smarter choices, and keep more money where it belongs.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • ‘They knew what they were doing’: This New York man’s $25K jet ski was stolen off his driveway in broad daylight — and he believes the thieves jammed his security cameras to get away with it

    While installing cameras around your home is a good way to protect your valuables from being stolen, thieves appear to be getting more sophisticated with their methods.

    Chris Montalbano of Long Island, New York learned this lesson the hard way.

    Don’t miss

    Montalbano, who had just pulled his Sea-Doo personal watercraft out of storage, recently discovered that the $25,000 jet ski was stolen from his driveway in broad daylight. His security cameras should have documented the theft, but as he discovered, three minutes of footage had disappeared.

    "You see the Jet Ski for one second, and then all of a sudden, it skips for, like, three minutes and there’s nothing,” Montalbano shared with CBS News. “And the Jet Ski is gone, but you don’t know how it left.”

    However, one camera — the one that’s furthest away from the driveway — did manage to capture the heist. A hooded man wearing a mask and driving a Dodge Durango can be seen hooking up the jet ski’s trailer to the hitch on the truck before driving off with Montalbano’s personal watercraft.

    Montalbano believes the thief must have briefly disabled the security cameras near the driveway in order to pull off this brazen theft.

    "It’s the only thing I can think of," he said. "They had to have been staking it out and known. Because you don’t just pull up like that. They knew what they were doing."

    How thieves can jam surveillance camera signals

    Michael Graziano, a cyber security expert, told CBS News that thieves now have the ability to jam Wi-Fi signals in order to disrupt security video recordings.

    "The camera may be working, but because it loses connection with the internet, there’s no recording that goes to the cloud," said Graziano.

    The Federal Communications Commission has banned the use of devices that jam signals — even law enforcement isn’t allowed to use them — but that hasn’t stopped thieves from using these devices to pull off their heists. Graziano also thinks today’s thieves can make these types of devices at home.

    Jamming devices can disrupt video recordings by overloading the Wi-Fi network with a stronger signal, blocking communication between the camera and its recording device. While this doesn’t deactivate a surveillance camera, it does effectively stop the camera from recording what it captures.

    Unfortunately, thieves using jamming devices to steal Montalbano’s jet ski isn’t an isolated incident. In fact, a woman in Phoenix, Arizona was almost the victim of a similar type of theft last year.

    Kim Komando and her husband were preparing dinner when they noticed two police helicopters flying above and shining lights on their property, according to an article Komando wrote for USA Today. Just a few moments later, the couple spotted members of the Phoenix SWAT team poking around Komando’s property. One of the SWAT team members reportedly yelled out, “yeah, there’s a jammer right here.”

    “A SWAT member said, ‘Ma’am, a South American gang is targeting homes to steal from. The jammer says you might have been next.’” Komando wrote in her article.

    And while SWAT managed to find the device before the Komando’s house was robbed, their neighbor just four doors down wasn’t so lucky. That homeowner reportedly got a notification that his security cameras were offline, leading him to think that his internet must have gone down.

    Meanwhile, in the span of just 10 minutes, thieves broke in and managed to steal valuables worth $100,000, as well as $25,000 in cash.

    KARE 11 News also reported in early 2024 about a string of burglaries in the Edina, Minnesota area where thieves used signal jammers to disrupt security systems. The news outlet reports that thieves may be able to purchase these illlegal jammers through suppliers outside of the country.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    How to protect yourself and your cameras

    Jamming devices may have created a seamless method for thieves to disrupt security cameras, but that doesn’t mean you can’t take steps to protect yourself and your property.

    For starters, try parking your cars — or in Montalbano’s case, your jet ski — inside the garage so that it can’t be seen from the road. This may not stop criminals from knowing where your cars are kept, but hiding them in the garage adds an extra layer of protection.

    Some homeowners, however, don’t have a garage and therefore can’t hide their expensive vehicles. In this case, these homeowners might choose to equip their home with surveillance cameras, as Montalbano had done. But there’s one thing Montalbano could have done to prevent his cameras from being disrupted by a jamming device.

    "Any camera system that you have, hardline it," said Graziano. "A hardline cable that goes right to the internet, that would stop someone from jamming it." In other words, Graziano suggests connecting your surveillance cameras directly to the internet using a cable instead of relying on a Wi-Fi connection.

    Some cameras may be able to record footage onto an SD card, which means they can record even without a Wi-Fi connection. Another way to deter thieves could be to install motion activated lights outside of your home, as well as timers on the lights inside your home that turn the lights on at certain times to make potential thieves think someone is home.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • Potential cottage buyers on the sidelines amid tariffs

    Potential cottage buyers on the sidelines amid tariffs

    With homeownership already feeling out of reach for many Canadians, the dream of owning a cottage is slipping even further away. Rising costs and new tariff threats are shaking buyer confidence, with nearly one in five Canadians putting cottage plans on hold, according to RE/MAX Canada’s 2025 Cabin & Cottage Trends Report.

    "Markets don’t like uncertainty, and we’re seeing that sentiment manifest in a quieter-than-normal spring market across recreational and traditional residential properties alike," Don Kottick, REMAX Canada president, said in a statement.

    "We are optimistic that recreational activity could pick up later this season, but there’s a big ‘but’ looming. Buyers and sellers will need further clarity around Canada’s approach to tariffs now that the election is behind us, before we see a return to more normal levels of activity."

    Cottage market catalysts

    For some Canadians, the cottage market is making a quiet comeback, with 34% of prospective buyers now viewing recreational properties as a safer, more attractive investment. This renewed interest may also be fueled by shifting travel habits. A February Leger survey cited in the RE/MAX report found that 48% of Canadians are less likely to travel to the U.S. in 2025, boosting appeal for local getaways and summer "staycations."

    Still, affordability remains the defining concern. According to the RE/MAX survey, 57% of potential buyers identified an affordable purchase price as a top priority, while 35% emphasized the importance of manageable maintenance costs.

    Wealth transfers, primary residences and other trends

    According to the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada, a massive $1 trillion wealth transfer from baby boomers to younger generations is set to begin in 2026. That transfer has the potential to impact cottage inventory and market, In fact, 17% of cottage owners who are planning to sell in the next one to two years said the next generation in their family is not interested in taking over the property, influencing their decision to sell, while another 17% plan to put the family cottage on the market as a result of an estate decision.

    As weill, thanks to affordability challenges in more urban areas as well as the rise in remote and hybrid work, 30% of Canadians who are planning on purchasing a cabin/cottage in the next one to two years see a cabin or cottage as a viable primary residence, while 29% say that housing shortages make a cottage a viable primary residence to consider.

    While REMAX notes this is a trend unlikely to widely take off, it can lead to a unique scenario for certain provinces and regions.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.