News Direct

Author: Chris Clark

  • Will Trump’s trade war trigger a stock market meltdown? What history reveals about plunging markets and how you can not only protect your investments but leverage tariff turmoil

    Wall Street hates uncertainty. But that’s exactly what investors are wrestling with as President Donald Trump continues to send mixed messages on his aggressive tariff policies.

    Most recently, his administration announced a 90-day pause on a wide-ranging set of "reciprocal" tariffs, save for those levied on China. A baseline 10% tariff remains in place, however, as do 25% tariffs on certain categories of goods from Canada and Mexico.

    Don’t miss

    Tariffs, essentially taxes on imports, are designed to level the trade playing field and protect domestic industries.

    But they raise costs for businesses and consumers, disrupt global supply chains and strain diplomatic relationships. All this shakes investor confidence, leading to volatility and downturns on Wall Street.

    Within two days of Trump’s global tariffs announcement, the S&P 500 tumbled 13% — well into correction territory. Economists were ramping up their recession forecasts. The markets rebounded following the 90-day-pause announcement, but uncertainty remains.

    Could his trade war tip the stock market into a full-blown meltdown? History suggests things could definitely get much worse.

    How the S&P 500 behaves in a recession

    The S&P 500 tracks 500 large U.S. companies that represent 80% of U.S. equity market value. Its performance is often synonymous with "the market," making it a core holding in 401(k)s, IRAs, and target-date funds.

    The index typically sees significant declines during economic downturns. For instance, the S&P plummeted by 49% during the tech bubble burst in the early 2000s, by 57% during the Great Recession (2007–2009), and saw a swift 34% decline during the relatively brief COVID-19 crash in 2020.

    What these historical insights suggest is that the current dip could be the tip of the iceberg. Investors could face serious financial setbacks.

    Older investors might find their retirement nest eggs shrinking at the very moment they planned to rely on them, triggering anxiety and difficult decisions.

    Panic? How to handle your investments now

    As stock markets plummet, many investors’ first instinct is to pull money out and stash it in cash or safer assets. But timing the market — trying to predict peaks and troughs — is notoriously challenging and typically backfires.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Instead, consider these smarter, more strategic moves:

    • Stay diversified. Spread your investments across asset classes — stocks, bonds, cash, real estate — to mitigate risks. If one sector tanks, your entire portfolio won’t go down with it.
    • Evaluate your risk tolerance. Are you losing sleep over market swings? You might be overexposed to stocks. Consider shifting to bonds or other safer, income-generating investments to provide stability.
    • Don’t stop investing. If you’re younger, a downturn can actually benefit your portfolio long-term as you can buy shares at discounted prices. Taking advantage of dollar-cost averaging as you continue to invest regularly means you’re setting yourself up for greater returns when markets rebound.

    Nearing retirement? How to protect your nest egg

    If you’re close to retirement, market turmoil feels particularly personal and understandably scary. A big market drop is devastating when you’re planning to rely on your investments soon. But panic selling can lock in losses permanently.

    Instead, take proactive steps to safeguard your retirement funds,

    • Review your allocation. Typically, as you approach retirement, your portfolio should shift toward lower-risk investments. Consider moving a larger portion into bonds, treasure securities or high-quality dividend stocks that tend to be less volatile.
    • Maintain liquidity. Keep enough cash or easily accessible funds to cover at least two years of living expenses. This approach means you won’t be forced to sell investments at unfavorable prices to meet immediate financial needs.
    • Consider professional advice. If you don’t already have a financial advisor, now might be the time. A professional can provide personalized strategies tailored specifically to your retirement goals and comfort with risk.

    Investors at every stage – whether young and growing their wealth or nearing retirement – can and should take proactive, thoughtful measures to recession-proof their portfolios.

    Ultimately, the key is balance. Don’t overreact, but don’t underestimate the potential risks.

    With strategic diversification, regular investment habits, and professional guidance, you can navigate the turbulence ahead, protecting your finances against the fallout from Trump’s tariff turmoil.

    What to read next

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • ‘Addicted to price hikes’: Disney is having internal concerns over the soaring cost of its theme parks, report says — is the ‘House of Mouse’ pricing out middle-class families for good?

    ‘Addicted to price hikes’: Disney is having internal concerns over the soaring cost of its theme parks, report says — is the ‘House of Mouse’ pricing out middle-class families for good?

    For generations, a trip to Disney has been a rite of passage for American families. It is a place where kids can hug their favorite characters, parents can relive childhood nostalgia, and memories are made on Main Street, U.S.A.

    But is Walt Disney World still “The Happiest Place on Earth”?

    Don’t miss

    For many, the price of the Disney dream is slipping further out of reach. The Wall Street Journal(WSJ) reported recently that Disney insiders fear the company has become “addicted to price hikes” and that the House of Mouse “has reached the limits of what middle-class Americans can afford.”

    Are Disney’s pricing schemes driving away its core audience?

    Over the past decade, Disney’s theme park prices have skyrocketed. A one-day ticket to Magic Kingdom in Florida, which cost around $85 in 2010, now easily surpasses $120 on peak days and can reach nearly $180.

    Factor in food, the hotel room, merchandise and Genie+ add-ons — those special passes that let you bypass the regular standby for quicker access to rides — and a family of four can expect to spend thousands of dollars on a single vacation.

    Following The Wall Street Journal’s report, Disney acknowledged that families are feeling the strain of today’s economic climate but highlighted promotions and special deals aimed at making visits more affordable.

    “We know our parks create life-long memories for families and we’ve worked hard to make a Disney vacation accessible to guests of all income levels,” said Hugh Johnston, Disney’s Chief Financial Officer. “With strong guest satisfaction scores and intent-to-visit ratings, our parks remain the most popular offering in the industry.”

    Disney’s dilemma: How much is too much?

    While Disney has defended its pricing as a reflection of demand, WSJ’s report indicates growing unease among company insiders who worry that the Disney experience has become unattainable for the middle-class families that fueled its growth for decades.

    Former Disney CEO Bob Chapek famously leaned into a premium pricing strategy, arguing that demand justified higher prices. But even under Bob Iger’s return, the company has struggled to balance profitability with accessibility — though shareholders are cheering recent estimate-beating quarterly results.

    Disney’s stock has faced turbulence, and while the parks remain a revenue powerhouse, the strategy of endless price hikes may not be sustainable.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Is Mickey pushing away the middle class?

    For many families, a Disney trip has become less of a spontaneous getaway and more of a long-term financial commitment.

    Once an affordable way for locals and frequent visitors to enjoy the parks, annual passes have been priced into near-extinction. The introduction of paid FastPass replacements like Genie+ has added another layer of expense, turning what was once a free perk into a costly necessity for visitors who don’t want to spend hours in line.

    A recent report by Mouse Hacking found that a baseline Disney World vacation for a family of four in 2025 will cost $7,093 for a five-night stay, including transportation, hotel, tickets and some meals. A deluxe experience can easily double that cost.

    Families on social media have voiced their frustration, and many longtime Disney fans have admitted they are reconsidering their loyalty.

    Yvonne Kindell, a bank compliance officer from Delaware, told WSJ that her family’s long-awaited Disney World trip turned into a money pit, costing over $3,000 for just two days — excluding airfare and lodging. The steep prices left her stressed about spending rather than enjoying the experience, highlighting growing concerns over Disney’s affordability for middle-class families.

    “The whole time, I was thinking about how much we were spending,” Kindell said.

    A brand at a crossroads?

    Disney’s parks division remains a financial stronghold, but alienating a significant portion of its customer base could have long-term repercussions. If middle-class families continue to feel priced out, Disney risks eroding the emotional connection that has kept generations returning.

    “The majority of Disney guests – probably the overwhelming majority – are still the middle class, splurging or going into debt,” wrote Tom Bricker on the Disney Tourist Blog, which offers planning guides and recommendations for visitors.

    “The upper class cannot sustain the parks and resorts. If you visited Walt Disney World today and could Thanos-snap away everyone who wasn’t part of the top 20%, the parks would suddenly look like ghost towns.”

    In response to criticism and competition from rival Universal’s Epic Universe offering, Disney has made moves to address affordability concerns, such as bringing back certain discounted ticket options and limited-time promotions. But the fundamental question remains: Is the magic still worth the price?

    As competition grows fiercer and consumer sentiment shifts, Disney may soon have to choose between short-term profitability and long-term brand loyalty. And if they bet on the former, they may find that even the most enchanted kingdom has limits.

    What to read next

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • Ray Dalio unveils an ETF based on his ‘All Weather’ strategy — typically just 30% stocks — as recession talk grows louder. Is now the time to follow in the legendary investor’s footsteps?

    Ray Dalio unveils an ETF based on his ‘All Weather’ strategy — typically just 30% stocks — as recession talk grows louder. Is now the time to follow in the legendary investor’s footsteps?

    Just as recession whispers grow louder and market uncertainty sends investors scrambling, legendary investor Ray Dalio has dropped a potential solution for the fearful seeking safety: an exchange-traded fund (ETF) based on his renowned "All Weather" portfolio strategy.

    Don’t miss

    Launched in collaboration with State Street Global Advisors, the SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) aims to shield investors from market volatility through Dalio’s approach that typically allows for only about 30% allocation to stocks.

    With fears of an economic downturn mounting, is now the perfect moment to follow Dalio’s cautious footsteps?

    Dalio isn’t just any Wall Street investor. He’s the billionaire founder of Bridgewater Associates, one of the world’s largest and most successful hedge funds. Known for his bold insights, impressive track record and investing innovations, he has become a financial guru revered for anticipating crises with uncanny accuracy.

    The ETF website says this offering "democratizes access to an innovative take on asset allocation." Bridgewater provides a daily model portfolio to the fund manager that then makes any trades required. From its inception on March 5 to March 31, the assets under management grew to almost $110 million.

    Markets are trembling and Dalio’s timing couldn’t be more provocative.

    Decoding the All Weather strategy

    Created in 1996, Dalio’s All Weather portfolio isn’t flashy; it’s methodical and built for resilience. The approach hinges on risk management through asset diversification designed to perform well in any economic environment – boom, bust, inflation, or deflation. Specifically, Dalio suggests an allocation that looks something like this:

    • 30% stocks: Primarily for growth, but deliberately kept low to limit volatility.
    • 40% long-term bonds and 15% intermediate bonds: Providing stability and cushioning against deflation or economic downturns.
    • 7.5% gold: An inflation hedge and safe haven during crises.
    • 7.5% commodities: Diversification to guard against inflationary spikes.

    A peek inside ALLW

    The newly launched ALLW ETF appears to follow Dalio’s allocation strategy.

    As of the end of March 2025, less than 30% its assets are in equities, namely the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPLG), the SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and the SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC).

    The remainder splits among treasury bonds of varying maturities, gold exposure, and diversified commodity positions – echoing Dalio’s classic defensive stance.

    In essence, the ALLW ETF is a turnkey version of Dalio’s approach, accessible with just a few clicks rather than requiring individual investors to manage complex allocations manually.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Is it right for you?

    The portfolio has delivered average annual returns of 4.4% in the last decade, compared to around 10% for the S&P 500, according to PortfoliosLab, proving that playing it safe is costly during periods that see stock market exuberance.

    Dalio’s approach does have an impressive track record during crises. In his Of Dollars and Data blog, Nick Maggiulli noted the All Weather Portfolio "has more dependable real returns and less severe drawdowns than other traditional portfolios." He found it declined less than the balanced 60/40 (U.S. Stock/Bond) portfolio during the Great Financial Crisis and COVID crash. It also outperformed the S&P 500 and the 60/40 portfolio in a high inflation environment (1970s) and a low growth environment (2000s).

    It’s not a universal panacea. Investors should carefully weigh the pros and cons and speak to a financial advisor to decide whether it’s right for them. Let’s consider the advantages first:

    Risk management

    Maggiulli emphasizes the strategy’s strength, noting it provides peace of mind during market crashes. Its steady returns and lower volatility make it particularly attractive for investors nearing retirement or those with low risk tolerance.

    Stress-free investing

    The ETF simplifies investing, offering a "set-it-and-forget-it" strategy ideal for investors overwhelmed by managing multiple investments.

    Now the risks.

    Returns during bull markets

    With only around 30% or lower of equity exposure, the All Weather portfolio inevitably lags during strong market rallies. Younger investors with longer investment horizons might find this conservative approach limiting.

    Bond and inflation risk

    Given current interest rate volatility and inflation uncertainties, heavy exposure to long-term bonds could pose risks if rates rise faster or higher than anticipated.

    Lack of personalization

    Investing in an ETF removes flexibility for tailored investment decisions. Investors with specific financial goals or ethical investing preferences might find this limiting.

    Cost

    Investors should consider that the All Weather ETF has an expense ratio of 0.85%, which is much higher than the average fee for funds. The three equity index funds it contains all have much lower expense ratios.

    Should you follow Dalio’s lead?

    Dalio’s timing certainly raises eyebrows. With an uncertain economy and recession fears intensifying, his conservative, defensive stance might appeal broadly. Maggiulli captures this sentiment succinctly: “This was the key idea for Dalio and Bridgewater – find something that works no matter what the future holds."

    For cautious investors, especially those nearing retirement, embracing Dalio’s strategy through ALLW could be an intelligent move, offering stability when markets seem unpredictable. However, younger, more aggressive investors may prefer strategies emphasizing growth, even at higher risk.

    Ultimately, the decision to follow Dalio now hinges on your risk tolerance, time horizon, and faith in the market’s immediate future. But one thing’s undeniable: as storm clouds gather over the economic landscape, Dalio’s All Weather ETF may provide a safe harbor in a storm, proving once again why investors worldwide listen closely when he speaks.

    What to read next

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • ‘What we’re doing is very big’: Trump has said he won’t rule out a recession — here are 3 simple strategies to help keep your finances safe in a downturn

    ‘What we’re doing is very big’: Trump has said he won’t rule out a recession — here are 3 simple strategies to help keep your finances safe in a downturn

    Sometimes what leaders don’t say speaks the loudest. So, when U.S. President Donald Trump refused to rule out a recession amid a wave of price-increasing tariffs and stubborn inflation, it sent a clear message: economic pain might be part of the plan whether America wants it or not.

    When Trump sat for an interview with Fox News in March and refused to rule out a recession, his answer — coupled with his Cabinet’s insistence that short-term pain could be worth it in the long run — has sparked fresh anxiety among consumers and economists already bracing for impact.

    Don’t miss

    “I hate to predict things like that,” Trump said when asked by Fox host Maria Bartiromo about a recession in a March interview. “There is a period of transition because what we’re doing is very big. We’re bringing wealth back to America. That’s a big thing … it takes a little time, but I think it should be great for us."

    Cabinet members have echoed their boss, arguing that short-term economic pain caused by tariffs on international imports and slashing federal spending would create long-term gains.

    That framing has hit a nerve. After all, recessions are more than abstract economic concepts: They mean job losses, tightened budgets and financial stress for millions. Here’s how to protect yourself.

    Below the surface of Trump’s words

    The backdrop to these remarks is crucial. Persistent inflation has consumers facing price hikes at grocery stores and retail shops, and housing affordability remains a challenge. Trump and his team argue that aggressive fiscal changes — including cutting federal programs and taking a hard line on trade via tariffs — are necessary corrections.

    Suggestions of short-term collateral damage have unnerved many economists, who worry that Trump’s tariffs will elevate inflation, stunt growth and increase recession risks. Goldman Sachs has raised its recession probability to 45%, citing tariffs as a significant factor.

    Deep cuts to government spending is already reducing economic activity and has cost tens of thousands of federal workers their jobs. Broad tariffs are expected to significantly increase the prices of imported goods on everything from electronics to cars, hitting consumers and businesses alike.

    Still, regardless of whether Trump’s policies result in a recession, proactively recession-proofing your finances is prudent. Here are three straightforward strategies to fortify your financial health against an extended downturn.

    Diversify your investments — smartly

    If recession fears become reality, diversified investments can shield your savings from significant losses. Rather than placing all your financial eggs into one basket, consider spreading your assets across multiple investment types:

    Dividend-paying stocks: Companies that reliably pay dividends — especially in stable sectors like health care, consumer staples and utilities — typically perform better during economic downturns.

    Bonds: Treasury and investment-grade corporate bonds offer steady returns and reduced volatility compared to stocks, providing crucial financial stability during turbulent times.

    Real estate: Historically, real estate investments — especially rental properties — often weather recessions well, providing both appreciation potential and steady rental income.

    The key here is not just diversification, but intentional diversification toward assets known for resilience in uncertain economic climates. You may want to consult with a financial advisor to calibrate your portfolio to your risk tolerance and financial goals.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Trim non-essential spending and build savings

    In booming economies, it’s easy to overlook how quickly unnecessary expenses add up. When recession risks loom, now is the time to ruthlessly assess your spending habits:

    Audit your budget: Go line by line and identify subscriptions, services or discretionary purchases you can either downgrade or eliminate entirely.

    Boost emergency savings: Aim to build a safety net of three to six months’ living expenses. Cash reserves offer a vital buffer, keeping you afloat if your income is reduced or interrupted during a recession.

    By proactively cutting non-essential spending, you create flexibility in your monthly budget, positioning yourself to weather economic shocks with greater confidence.

    Prioritize paying down high-interest debt

    High-interest debt can become crushing when economic conditions tighten. As borrowing rates spike during a recession, carrying significant debt can rapidly spiral out of control. Therefore, prioritizing debt repayment now is a critical protective step:

    Target credit card balances first: These typically carry the highest interest rates, draining significant portions of your income. Implement strategies like the “avalanche method,” paying down debts starting with the highest interest rates.

    Refinance wisely: If possible, consider refinancing high-interest loans into lower-interest options, reducing your monthly payments and overall debt burden. But act quickly — refinancing becomes harder and less favorable as recessions take hold.

    Proactively attacking debt not only saves significant money in interest payments but also boosts your financial resilience, giving you greater flexibility if economic hardship strikes.

    What to read next

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • ‘I could be dead in a year or two’: Social Security asks California man with HIV to repay $201K in disability benefits — here’s what to do if Social Security slashes your benefits

    ‘I could be dead in a year or two’: Social Security asks California man with HIV to repay $201K in disability benefits — here’s what to do if Social Security slashes your benefits

    Government spending and jobs are being cut across the board, and it doesn’t seem like there isn’t an agency left untouched — including Social Security.

    This became all too real, and frightening, for Paul Aguilar, who recently got a letter from the agency telling him his disability benefits had been slashed. Even worse? The agency claims it overpaid Aguilar $201,000, and it wants the money back.

    Don’t miss

    The letter said that “there were concerns about my benefits and that they should have actually stopped December 2013, and that I now owed them over $200,000 and I had 30 days to pay that $200,000," Aguilar told ABC7 News.

    Aguilar has been unable to work and on disability due to his HIV-positive status since 2005. Now, Social Security wants him to pay back a decade’s worth of benefits in just one month.

    While the sheer size of the bill is scary enough, Aguilar said he’s most worried about his medical care getting cut off and giving the disease a chance to catch up.

    “The fact that they cut off my medical care scares me more than anything else because if I can’t access my medical care, it means I can’t access my medications which means eventually my HIV virus disease will spiral out of control and I could be dead in a year or two.”

    Aguilar believes DOGE is behind his benefits being slashed, and he might be right: the Social Security Administration released a statement in February about its plans for structural reorganization in response to DOGE cuts and changes from the Trump administration. Even before DOGE, the agency has come under scrutiny for overpayments that were later flagged for repayment, stunning and scaring benefit recipients.

    But that isn’t stopping Aguilar from fighting back. He’s been working with a lawyer, his doctor and is reaching out to lawmakers.

    What you can do

    As the Elon Musk-led DOGE targets federal government agencies for drastic cuts, it’s fair to wonder if and when disability benefits might be cut. But there are measures you can take if it happens to you.

    If you want to file an appeal, do it immediately. In order to keep your benefits during the appeal process, you need to make that request within 10 days of notice. You then have 60 days to file an official appeal.

    Consulting a disability attorney as soon as possible is the smartest route to take. An attorney can walk you through the appeals process and go to any benefits hearings if necessary. Even better, many disability lawyers handling Social Security cases work on contingency, which means you only pay them if they get your benefits reinstated.

    Make sure to gather all relevant documentation related to your disability, including medical records, physician statements, treatment and therapy records, and any correspondence with the Social Security Administration. Be sure to also include any evidence that your disability prohibits you from daily tasks or working.

    In the meantime, you might need to explore other coverage options. Even if your SSDI benefits are cut, Medicare coverage may be available.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Preparing for the uncertain

    The current economic and political landscape might have folks feeling anxious about the availability of benefits and services. Social Security has appeared acutely at risk, as cuts have already hurt staffing levels and closed offices.

    Let’s explore some ways you can prepare yourself for possible cuts.

    Set up an emergency fund: Consider opening a high-yield savings account for small but consistent auto-transfers. Aim for an amount that will cover three to six months of essential expenses.

    Analyze your budget: Track your non-essential expenses to see what could be removed quickly in the event of a sudden cut to your benefits. Formulate a hypothetical budget that only focuses on essential bills, especially medication, treatments or transportation related to your disability.

    Consider flexible work options: If your disability prevents you from working 40 hours, consider part-time, remote or freelance work — anything to build up that emergency fund. Make sure to research what work limits SSDI has in place, as working could impact your benefits eligibility.

    Explore other resources: Research your eligibility for other benefits services, such as SNAP, Medicare, utility discounts, housing assistance and nonprofits. If your disability benefits get cut suddenly, you’ll know which services to turn to quickly. Also consider checking out the Disability Benefits Consortium, a national group of charities that provide resources, advocacy and guidance in the benefits system.

    Keep track of your benefits: Benefits policies are rapidly changing, with criteria for assistance getting tightened. Make sure to stay alert and up-to-date with current SSA policy and respond promptly to any correspondence from the agency. This will help keep you informed and prepared in the event you need to appeal a cut to your benefits.

    What to read next

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • Degrees aren’t enough: Why educated professionals are now juggling multiple jobs to stay afloat in today’s economy

    Degrees aren’t enough: Why educated professionals are now juggling multiple jobs to stay afloat in today’s economy

    In February 2025, nearly 9 million Americans held multiple jobs. What’s more surprising? Many of these moonlighters aren’t just scraping by — they have college degrees and stable careers.

    A new report from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis highlights this striking shift, revealing that even educated professionals now juggle multiple gigs just to keep pace financially.

    Don’t miss

    The Fed also notes an interesting dilemma in the data: Moonlighting workers contribute to the tight labor market by working more total hours across different jobs.

    Because these over-employed individuals are already the gaps in the workforce, their extra hours may reduce opportunities for unemployed people seeking traditional full-time positions.

    “Overemployed workers demonstrate a clear willingness to trade higher hourly wages for increased total earnings,” the report states. ”By working significantly more hours, they effectively increase their annual compensation. This behavior might be attributed to a desire to keep pace with recent inflation, as individuals actively seek ways to supplement their income and counteract the erosion of purchasing power.”

    Gone are the days when multiple-job holders were primarily low-wage earners trying to make ends meet. Today, even those with diplomas proudly hanging on their walls are pulling double duty. But what’s driving educated Americans to hustle harder than ever?

    The economic squeeze

    First, let’s talk inflation. It’s relentless and unforgiving, with prices for groceries and other everyday items remaining high. For many younger workers, student loan debt is a significant burden on their cash flow. As of March 202, about 4 million borrowers were behind on their student loan payments, making a substantial increase in delinquency rates since the resumption of payments after the pandemic pause.

    But economics isn’t the only factor behind the trend.

    A cultural shift in how Americans perceive work also plays a significant role. Millennials and Gen Z, in particular, are more accepting of multiple income streams as a strategy for achieving financial independence and career flexibility.

    For them, holding several jobs can be as much about autonomy, skills diversification and creating financial resilience as much as simple survival.

    The pandemic accelerated this shift dramatically, normalizing remote and hybrid work arrangements. Digital platforms like Fiverr, Uber, and Upwork have made securing supplemental income opportunities easier than ever.

    Now, educated professionals effortlessly toggle between primary jobs and side hustles, exploiting digital tools and remote work to maximize their earning potential.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    The dark side of moonlighting

    Despite the benefits, working multiple comes at a cost. The harsh reality? Chronic stress, burnout and diminished work-life balance. Constantly juggling competing priorities, deadlines and employer expectations is an exhausting endeavor, placing workers at risk for mental and physical health issues.

    Financially, the juggling act can also get messy. Multiple income streams complicate tax filing and financial planning, requiring careful tracking and strategic management. Without proper oversight, extra earnings could be swallowed by taxes and financial inefficiencies.

    Then there’s the lack of labor protections. Many side gigs don’t offer essential worker benefits such as health insurance, retirement contributions or paid leave, leaving educated workers exposed and vulnerable. If economic conditions worsen or personal crises arise, these workers could face rough financial setbacks.

    Will the trend become permanent?

    Experts increasingly believe that multi-job holding, especially among educated workers, is shifting from a temporary trend to the new norm. With ongoing economic volatility, student debt, inflation and changing workforce expectations, this pattern seems likely to stick around.

    So, what does this mean for the future?

    Employers may have to adapt quickly. To retain top talent, they’ll need to offer more flexibility, competitive compensation and incentives that acknowledge their employees’ changing economic realities.

    “Lifetime employment at a single job is largely a thing of the past,” entrepreneurship expert Caroline Castrillon recently wrote in a recent Forbes article examining the rise of non-linear career paths. “While some employers may frown upon non-linear careers, those attitudes are quickly changing.”

    The bottom line is clear: Even a college degree no longer guarantees financial security. As educated Americans hustle harder than ever, the very structure of the workforce is transforming. Multi-job holding isn’t just about extra pocket money anymore — it’s rapidly becoming essential for survival in today’s unpredictable economy.

    What to read next

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • US shipbuilding sank as China became the dominant player — now Trump wants to ‘resurrect’ the industry and investors are betting on this one stock

    US shipbuilding sank as China became the dominant player — now Trump wants to ‘resurrect’ the industry and investors are betting on this one stock

    U.S. shipyards built thousands of cargo ships during World Wars I and II. In the 1970s, they built about 5-25 new ships per year. In the 1980s, this number fell to around 5 ships a year, and it has stayed there ever since, according to a 2023 Congressional Research Service report.

    Don’t miss

    Meanwhile, China has rapidly grown its industry with government subsidies and state planning. It replaced South Korea to become the world’s leading shipbuilder in 2010, and currently builds hundreds of ships a year. Its market share went from less than 5% in 1999 to more than 50% in 2023, according to the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), which said it was attained by unfair means and hurt American interests.

    China’s largest state-owned shipbuilder built more commercial vessels by tonnage in 2024 than the entire U.S. shipbuilding industry has built since the end of World War II, according to a recent report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    The authors also highlighted the fact that this market dominance has been boosting the country’s navy. "Foreign companies are inadvertently helping to propel China’s naval buildup by buying Chinese-made ships and sharing dual-use technologies with Chinese shipyards," they wrote.

    But President Donald Trump says it’s finally time to "resurrect" America’s shipbuilding sector – and investors are already placing their bets on one company poised to benefit significantly.

    Trump’s promise

    In a recent address, Trump signed a bold executive order aimed squarely at reviving American shipbuilding. Central to this strategy is the establishment of an Office of Shipbuilding in the White House, tasked with streamlining policy, cutting red tape, and revitalizing domestic maritime production. Special tax incentives will also be offered.

    "We are also going to resurrect the American shipbuilding industry, including commercial shipbuilding and military shipbuilding," Trump said during his recent address to Congress. “We used to make so many ships. We don’t make them anymore very much, but we’re going to make them very fast, very soon, it will have a huge impact.”

    Adding teeth to this ambitious strategy, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) proposed steep penalties – up to $1.5 million per vessel – on Chinese-built ships docking at American ports. Any shipping firm with at least one order on the books for a vessel made in China would also have to pay a fee. These fees would apply to 90% of the world’s vessels, according to the World Shipping Council.

    However, after a backlash from various stakeholders, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told lawmakers about the fees, "They’re not all going to be implemented. They’re not all going to be stacked."

    The message is clear: Trump intends to challenge China’s maritime dominance head-on, part of a larger conflict centered on trade.

    Skeptics of Trump’s plan suggest the available labor pool can’t address today’s demand – nevermind a new wave of building meant to counter China’s dominance. “We’re trying to get blood from a turnip,” Government Accountability Office analyst Shelby Oakley told ProPublica. “The domestic workforce is just not there.”

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Investors eye a key stock

    Investors, sensing the shift in tides, are eyeing one company in particular as a way to seize on the renewed focus on shipbuilding: Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII).

    The Virginia-based shipbuilder is America’s largest military shipbuilding firm, renowned for constructing nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, submarines, and amphibious assault ships. HII is uniquely positioned to capitalize on Trump’s new maritime initiative.

    Following Trump’s announcement, Huntington Ingalls Industries, which reported $11.5 billion in revenue in 2024, saw its stock surge significantly.

    Investors have poured into HII, betting the company stands to gain tremendously from Trump’s shipbuilding push. HII stock is up 7% in the last month, reflecting growing investor enthusiasm and confidence in the company’s prospects. Goldman Sachs recently upgraded the stock from Sell to Buy and raised its price target from $145 to $234.

    But challenges still loom large on the horizon.

    Analysts caution that while Trump’s tariffs on Chinese vessels might seem like a decisive strike against foreign competition, they could inadvertently drive up shipping costs, impacting consumers through higher prices and potentially escalating trade tensions.

    Meanwhile, rebuilding America’s shipyards and skilled workforce will require substantial, sustained investment beyond short-term policy shifts.

    Despite these concerns, Trump remains bullish, and investors appear convinced that a revival is possible. Huntington Ingalls Industries stands ready to ride this wave of optimism and strategic backing.

    Whether or not Trump’s ambitious vision for American shipbuilding ultimately succeeds remains uncertain. Yet, there’s renewed enthusiasm for the U.S. maritime industry – enough to spark investor enthusiasm and potentially shift the balance of maritime power back toward American shores.

    What to read next

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • ‘Any reduction in federal Medicaid spending would leave states with tough choices’: Musk’s taking the chainsaw to federal budget has experts sounding the alarm

    ‘Any reduction in federal Medicaid spending would leave states with tough choices’: Musk’s taking the chainsaw to federal budget has experts sounding the alarm

    Musician Cat Stevens (Yusuf) once ruefully sang that the first cut is the deepest, which explains why many Americans are bracing themselves for the fallout of Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) cutting of the federal budget.

    The world’s richest man wants to cut $1 trillion from the federal budget. In a recent Fox News interview, Musk declared that the cuts wouldn’t harm essential U.S. services, promising Americans they could have their fiscal cake and eat it, too.

    Don’t miss

    “The government is not efficient,” Musk said. “There’s a lot of waste and fraud. So, we feel confident that a 15 percent reduction can be done without affecting any of the critical government services.”

    But as analysts and concerned citizens point out the numbers — and reality — might not add up to Musk’s optimism.

    Millions of Americans depend on essential services like health care and retirement support, so the coming months may prove critical in determining whether Musk’s actions will deliver prosperity or deepen economic woes.

    What does $1 trillion in cuts really mean?

    What’s pinching the chain in Musk’s cuts is President Donald Trump’s recent round of tariffs.

    The broad-sweeping tariffs, which have been temporarily placed on pause, have driven a wedge between his administration and the Tesla billionaire. Since Inauguration Day, DOGE has spearheaded layoffs across all departments of the federal government, leading to concerns that Musk is moving too fast and endangering services counted on by millions of Americans.

    DOGE, and its cuts, have yet to be approved by Congress. But Musk and his team argue that federal spending has ballooned irresponsibly, claiming wasteful expenditures can easily absorb these cuts without hurting Americans’ daily lives. Recent events, however, suggest the reality might be more complicated.

    Cuts made by DOGE are impacting older adults particularly hard. Social Security offices, a vital resource for retirees managing their benefits, have seen significant staffing cuts, causing online systems to buckle and physical locations to become overwhelmed. Older Americans — many unfamiliar with digital platforms — now face hurdles to support. Retirees have flooded social media and news outlets venting their frustrations, suggesting Musk’s self-described “revolution” feels more like abandonment.

    The cuts have also injected unpredictability into the stock market. Experts suggest Wall Street, already in turmoil over tariffs, might be underestimating the impact of the DOGE cuts, which could reduce consumer confidence.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    What if Medicare and Medicaid are on the chopping block?

    Beyond these immediate impacts lies a deeper concern: Experts warn the math behind Musk’s $1 trillion cuts doesn’t add up without significantly scaling back Medicare and Medicaid. They represent nearly a quarter of the federal budget.

    If cuts are made to Medicare and Medicaid, millions could find their health coverage compromised or significantly reduced.

    Currently, Medicare serves approximately 67 million Americans. Medicaid provides essential healthcare to roughly 72 million low-income individuals, including children, older adults in nursing homes and disabled Americans. Any substantial reduction in these programs would inevitably ripple across communities, straining hospitals and leaving countless families struggling to afford basic medical care.

    Health policy experts have sounded the alarm for those reasons. According to a recent Kaiser Family Foundation report, cutting even a small percentage of Medicare or Medicaid could lead to thousands of healthcare facility closures, disproportionately affecting rural and underserved urban areas.

    “Any reduction in federal Medicaid spending would leave states with tough choices about how to offset reductions through tax increases or cuts to other programs, like education,” Kaiser Family Foundation analysts concluded in a recent Medicaid brief studying the impacts of proposed Medicaid cuts. “If states are not able to offset the loss of federal funds with new taxes or reductions in other state spending, states would have to make cuts to their Medicaid programs.”

    Public reaction

    Public skepticism (and incredulity) underscore a fundamental tension between Musk’s economic vision and the gritty realities facing everyday Americans.

    Economists widely acknowledge the need for fiscal responsibility and targeted spending cuts. However, Musk’s trillion-dollar gamble highlights crucial trade-offs between government size and service quality, forcing hard conversations about national priorities. As debates rage and details emerge, citizens must remain informed and engaged, understanding exactly what’s at stake.

    What to read next

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • Here’s the withdrawal rate Canadian retirees need to start using in 2025, according to new report — and it’s shockingly low

    Here’s the withdrawal rate Canadian retirees need to start using in 2025, according to new report — and it’s shockingly low

    Retirees, brace yourselves: The golden rule of retirement withdrawals just got a cold dose of reality. A new report from Morningstar recommends the safe withdrawal rate for retirees in 2025 is a mere 3.7% — a significant adjustment from the decades-old 4% rule that had dominated retirement planning.

    Amid rising costs, volatile markets and new prospects for inflation, a lower rate could disrupt the way many retirees think about their financial strategies.

    If you’re wondering what Morningstart’s updated benchmark means for your golden years — and whether you’ll have enough to sustain a 30-plus-year retirement — it’s time to dig deeper into how you can adjust your plan for success.

    What is the safe withdrawal rate for 2025?

    A safe withdrawal rate is the percentage of your retirement savings you should be able to withdraw annually without risk of your money running out too soon.

    For decades, the 4% rule was the de facto standard, offering retirees a simple formula for how much of their nest egg they could withdraw each year in order to make it last for 30 years. (Remember: the safe withdrawal rate is not law, but rather a suggested guide from financial planners.)

    In recent years, the benchmark has come under fire from finance experts, including Suze Orman, who say the rule has become a cookie-cutter prescription that doesn’t account for retirees’ varied financial needs.

    Orman says says those who need a target should consider 3%to stretch their money as long as possible, while the financial adviser credited with coining the rule, Bill Bengen, now says the rate should be 4.7%.

    Morningstar’s updated analysis points to 3.7% as its new suggested rate, down slightly from 4% in 2024, but what is the reason behind this?

    Why has the rate dropped?

    Morningstar’s downward revision stems from a combination of economic and demographic factors:

    • Market uncertainty: After years of market turbulence, including fluctuating interest rates, retirees face increased risks to their investments.
    • Persistent inflation: Although inflation has cooled somewhat since its peak in 2022-2023, it remains above pre-pandemic levels, making everyday expenses more costly.
    • Longevity trends: Canadians are living longer, which means retirees must plan for more years of spending — potentially, 30 to 40 years in retirement.

    These factors underscore the need for a cautious approach to withdrawals, especially in the early years of retirement when overspending can have long-term consequences.

    How to calculate your safe withdrawal rate

    Knowing what rate is best for you starts with understanding your retirement savings and expected expenses. Let’s say you’ve saved $900,000 for retirement.

    Using the new 3.7% guideline, you’d withdraw $33,300 annually. By contrast, the 4% rule equates to withdrawing $36,000 annually.

    Now, compare this number to your expected yearly expenses. If your spending exceeds your withdrawal amount, you may need to explore ways to cut costs, boost income or supplement withdrawals with other savings or investments.

    For retirees with diverse portfolios, adjusting withdrawals based on market conditions can also help preserve savings. For example, in years when the market performs well, you might take out slightly more, while pulling back during downturns to protect your principal.

    Withdrawal strategies for 2025

    Adopting the right withdrawal strategy is crucial for retirees navigating today’s uncertain economic landscape. Here are a few approaches to consider:

    • The 3.7% rule: Stick to the updated safe withdrawal rate, recalibrating annually to account for changes in expenses and portfolio performance. This conservative approach prioritizes long-term stability.
    • Bucket strategy: Divide your assets into “buckets” based on short-, medium- and long-term needs. For example, cash or bonds for immediate expenses and stocks for long-term growth.
    • Dynamic withdrawals: Adjust withdrawals based on portfolio returns. In good years, withdraw more; in bad years, reduce spending to extend the longevity of your savings.

    Each strategy has its risks and rewards. The 3.7% rule offers simplicity and a steady income but may feel too restrictive for retirees with large savings or shorter life expectancies. Dynamic strategies provide flexibility, but require careful monitoring and may not work for those who prefer predictable income.

    Pros and cons of a higher withdrawal rate

    Taking out more than 3.7% annually might seem tempting, especially if you have a substantial nest egg or immediate financial needs.

    But there are risks: Withdrawing too much early in retirement increases the likelihood of depleting your savings later — particularly if market conditions worsen.

    On the flip side, retirees with shorter life expectancies or guaranteed income sources, like pensions, may justify higher withdrawal rates.

    For instance, someone with $900,000 saved and a $30,000 annual pension might comfortably withdraw 4% to 5% of their savings without jeopardizing their financial future.

    Planning for success

    The lower safe withdrawal rate for 2025 is a wake-up call for retirees to reassess their financial plans.

    If you’re nearing retirement or already retired, consider reevaluating your budget to identify discretionary expenses you can trim to reduce withdrawals. Explore part-time work, annuities or rental income to supplement savings.

    A professional can help you create a tailored withdrawal strategy that aligns with your goals and risk tolerance.

    Sources

    1. Morningstar: Retirees, Here’s What Your Withdrawal Rate Should Be in 2025 by Christine Benz and Susan Dziubinski (Jan 2, 2025)

    2. YouTube: Suze Orman: Why High Income Earners Are Living Paycheck To Paycheck by Moneywise (May 26, 2023)

    3. Statistics Canada: Top five highlights from a new report on the health of Canadians, 2023 (Sept 13, 2023)

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • Economist Arthur Laffer — who was once honored by Trump — warns 25% tariffs could add nearly $5,000 to your new car’s price. Here’s how to protect your finances amid Trump’s trade wars

    Economist Arthur Laffer — one of President Trump’s most trusted advisors and a recipient of Trump’s Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2019 — has issued a stark warning to Americans: Trump’s 25% tariffs could soon drive car prices sharply upward, adding as much as $4,711 to the cost of a new vehicle.

    As American consumers prepare for sticker shock, it’s crucial to understand what’s driving this price hike and how you can safeguard your finances from the coming squeeze.

    Don’t miss

    Laffer is renowned for his supply-side economic theories and famed "Laffer Curve," which tries to illustrate the relationship between tax rates and government tax revenue. He isn’t someone to dismiss lightly, especially considering his close relationship with Trump.

    What’s driving this surge in car prices?

    At the center of this latest economic storm is the potential elimination of an important trade exemption under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). The USMCA, implemented during Trump’s first term as president to replace NAFTA, currently allows certain trade protections that shield American consumers from steep price increases.

    The auto industry would do better if Trump kept the supply chain rules laid out in the USMCA, according to Laffer’s analysis obtained by The Associated Press. Tariff risks contradict the President’s goals of strengthening the nation’s economic stability, Laffer wrote.

    “A 25% tariff would not only shrink, or possibly eliminate, profit margins for U.S. manufacturers but also weaken their ability to compete with international rivals,” Laffer said.

    Laffer’s analysis showed if the exemption is removed, the average new vehicle price could skyrocket by an eye-watering $4,711. Even with the exemption in place, Laffer estimates car prices will still climb by about $2,765 due to the tariffs.

    Either way, American car buyers are likely to face significantly higher costs at dealerships nationwide. The stakes are high, and the economic fallout could reverberate through households already grappling with high inflation and strained budgets.

    Why are Trump’s tariffs creating so much turbulence? Vehicles assembled in America still depend heavily on imported parts — particularly from Canada and Mexico, both key partners under the USMCA framework. If these exemptions vanish, tariffs will directly inflate costs for automakers — expenses that will inevitably be passed on to consumers through higher prices.

    Adding nearly $5,000 to the average vehicle threatens affordability for many Americans. High vehicle costs could mean larger auto loans, heftier monthly payments and greater financial strain. For families needing new (or newer) vehicles for jobs and other necessities, these increases could delay important life decisions, such as homeownership, education investments or retirement savings.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    How can you protect your finances?

    With auto prices climbing, savvy financial strategies become essential. Here’s how to navigate this challenging landscape and ensure you’re getting the best possible deal.

    Negotiate your auto loan carefully

    • Shop around for financing: Compare rates from multiple banks and credit unions before settling. Even a minor reduction in your interest rate could save thousands over the life of your loan.
    • Avoid longer loan terms: While stretching your loan might reduce monthly payments, you’ll pay significantly more interest over time. Aim for a loan term of no more than four or five years to keep your finances in check.

    Be smart about insurance

    Don’t settle for the first quote. Insurance costs vary widely among providers, so regularly compare rates to secure the most competitive deal.

    Bundling your auto insurance with home or renters insurance can also yield significant savings.

    Consider buying used

    The used car market might be your best bet if tariffs make new cars prohibitively expensive. Buying a reliable, pre-owned vehicle that’s two-to-three years old can save you substantial money, as cars depreciate most rapidly during their initial years.

    Certified pre-owned (CPO) vehicles often provide peace of mind by including warranties and thorough inspections, offering nearly the same security as buying new.

    Timing your purchase

    If you can wait out the initial tariff turmoil, consider delaying your car purchase. Prices might stabilize or even drop once the market adjusts and production methods adapt.

    Keep an eye on market trends and manufacturer incentives. Dealerships eager to clear inventory or meet sales targets might offer better deals during turbulent economic periods.

    Trump’s tariffs could push new vehicle prices to levels that challenge household budgets across America. By remaining vigilant, strategically navigating loans and insurance, and considering used or delayed purchases, you can cushion yourself against the economic shock.

    What to read next

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.