News Direct

Author: Danielle Antosz

  • I’m 24, debt-free, and earning my first steady salary. My dream is to own a house — but I’ve heard I should max out an IRA before building up a down payment. Which path do I choose?

    I’m 24, debt-free, and earning my first steady salary. My dream is to own a house — but I’ve heard I should max out an IRA before building up a down payment. Which path do I choose?

    Suppose you’re 24 and earning a steady salary for the first time in your life.

    Your goal is clear: save $10,000 per year and eventually buy a house. But like many in their 20s, you’re unsure whether you should prioritize retirement savings or homeownership.

    Don’t miss

    Max out my IRA now or put all my savings toward buying a home? It’s a question increasingly common among young adults navigating early financial decisions.

    It’s not a stupid question at all. In fact, it’s a smart one — and there’s no one-size-fits-all answer.

    Here’s a closer look at the tradeoffs of investing in retirement early versus saving aggressively for a home.

    Pros and cons of maxing your IRA

    Opening and contributing to an IRA in your early 20s is one of the most powerful moves you can make for your long-term financial security. Thanks to the magic of compound growth, even small contributions made early can grow into significant savings by retirement.

    Upsides of maxing your IRA

    • Early growth = less pressure later. A dollar saved in your 20s has decades to grow. For example, if you invest $6,000 at age 24 and earn an average annual return of 7%, that single contribution could grow to nearly $45,000 by the time you’re 65.

    • Tax benefits. Depending on the type of IRA you choose, you could see tax advantages now (traditional IRA) or in retirement (Roth IRA).

    • Flexibility with Roth IRAs. If you choose a Roth IRA, you can withdraw your contributions (not your earnings) at any time without taxes or penalties. That gives you some wiggle room if you later decide to use the money for a down payment.

    That said, using an IRA as a piggy bank for home savings isn’t ideal — and comes with major risks.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Downsides of maxing your IRA

    • Market volatility. Unlike a high-yield savings account, your IRA is invested in the market. If you plan to buy a home in the next few years, a market decline could drop your savings just when you need them. Remember, with investments, you don’t truly "lose" money until you withdraw.

    • Retirement money should stay retirement money. Even if you technically can pull Roth contributions early, you shouldn’t unless you absolutely have to — if, say, you’re facing eviction or medical emergencies. The earlier you raid retirement accounts, the harder it is to rebuild your savings.

    • Complex withdrawal rules. While the IRS does allow you to withdraw up to $10,000 from an IRA for a first-time home purchase without penalty, it only applies under certain conditions and may still involve taxes.

    The takeaway? An IRA is a powerful tool for long-term financial growth but it’s not a substitute for a short-term house fund. Use it to set up your future, not to float your present.

    Other factors to consider

    Before deciding whether to max out your IRA or focus on a home down payment, it’s important to look at the full financial picture. Buying a house matters but so does your financial foundation.

    • 1. Do you have an emergency fund? If you don’t have at least three months of expenses saved, hitting pause on both home and retirement savings might be smart. An emergency fund protects you from dipping into retirement accounts or taking on debt when life throws you a curveball.

    • 2. What’s your timeline for buying a home? If your goal is to buy a house in the next three years, your savings strategy should be conservative. A high-yield savings account or short-term CD may be better than investing the money, since it avoids market risk. But if homeownership is five or more years away, splitting your savings between a Roth IRA and a house fund could make sense.

    • 3. Are you carrying high-interest debt? Paying down credit cards or other high-interest loans can offer a guaranteed return — often more than you’d earn investing. It also improves your credit score, which can impact the mortgage rate you’ll pay when you do buy a home.

    • 4. Are you taking advantage of employer retirement plans? If your job offers a 401(k) match, prioritize that before the IRA. It’s essentially free money your employer is contributing to your retirement. After that, any leftover savings can be divided based on your goals.

    • 5. Why is buying a home important to you? Buying a home is a major milestone, but it’s not the only one. Saving for retirement in your 20s means you won’t have to play catch-up later. On the flip side, if owning a home will provide stability, reduce rent costs, or serve as a stepping stone toward building equity, it may be worth focusing on.

    Ultimately, there’s no perfect answer. But if you’re asking these questions now, that’s not a sign you’re on the right track.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • ‘Basically forced medication’: Florida’s Ron DeSantis signed broad farm bill rewriting rules on water, agriculture — but here’s why everyone from dentists to bankers worry about its impacts

    ‘Basically forced medication’: Florida’s Ron DeSantis signed broad farm bill rewriting rules on water, agriculture — but here’s why everyone from dentists to bankers worry about its impacts

    Florida has rewritten a large chunk of its agricultural rule book.

    On May 15, Governor Ron DeSantis signed Senate Bill 700 into law. The 100-plus page “Florida Farm Bill” rewires state agriculture from the faucet to the skies.

    Don’t miss

    The law bans community water fluoridation, forbids plant-based drinks from using words like “milk,” grounds activist drones, shields 4-H projects from zoning fights and lets growers sue banks that deny loans over climate policies. Most provisions kick in by July 1, reshaping daily life for farmers and consumers alike.

    Here’s how these changes could impact Floridians.

    Removing fluoride from water could have health implications

    The headline change of the bill is a statewide ban on adding fluoride to drinking water. The law doesn’t specifically mention fluoride; rather the law bans “The use of any additives in a public water system which do not meet the definition of a water quality additive as defined in s. 403.852, or the use of any additives included primarily for health-related purposes."

    DeSantis called fluoridation “forced medication on people” and said residents can add the mineral at home if they wish. Florida is only the second state to ban fluoride in drinking water; Utah outlawed it in March. But officials and medical experts are concerned about the long-term impact.

    Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava shared a statement in which she said, in part:

    “I am deeply disappointed by the Florida Legislature’s decision to pursue a statewide ban on water fluoridation, a decision that disregards the overwhelming consensus of dentists, doctors, and medical experts and will end a practice that has been in place for decades to protect our health.”

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and American Dental Association still rank water fluoridation among the top public-health wins of the 20th century, noting it cuts cavities by more than 25% even in the toothpaste era.

    Hawaii, where only 11% of residents get fluoridated water, records the nation’s worst child-decay rate — 71% of third-graders have tooth decay, compared to the national average of 52%.

    The CDC notes that cavities often go untreated and can cause pain and severe infections that may result in issues with eating, playing and learning. In some cases, cavities can lead to abscesses, which can, in rare cases, lead to death.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Food labeling changes

    The bill also orders “truth in labeling,” targeting plant-based or lab-grown products. These products can no longer use the words milk, meat, poultry or eggs.

    "If it’s not grown on a hoof, you’re not going to be able to call it meat," Florida Commissioner of Agriculture Wilton Simpson said at the signing ceremony held on his property.

    "And if it’s not out of an udder, you’re not going to be able to call it milk."

    For producers, this law change means they must make changes to labeling including removing the word "milk" from packaging for milk alternatives like soy milk, oat milk and almond milk. Shoppers can expect clearer language on the products they buy and, possibly, a modest price hike as procedures scramble to update their packaging.

    Other farm-related laws and their impact

    The law also covers three other farm-related topics, including drone usage over farms, 4-H funding and how lenders extend credit to farmers.

    Flying a drone over agricultural or hunting land without written consent is now illegal. Florida House of Representatives Member Danny Alvarez said the measure ensures farmers are protected.

    "Our farmers and hunters are the backbone of Florida’s heritage, and they deserve to be protected from those who would use drones to intimidate and disrupt them. I’m glad to see Commissioner Simpson lead forward and fight back against those who would try to cause them harm,” shared Rep. Alvarez

    Drones have been used by activists looking to monitor poaching and illegal deforestation and keep a watchful eye on zoos and aquariums. In 2013, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) launched a drone campaign to track illegal hunting in Massachusetts. They’ve also been used to get a bird’s-eye view of factory farms in the midwest. However, no major news sources have reported on any Florida farmers being harassed by drones. In fact, farmers are beginning to use drones to detect pests and signs of stress in crops.

    The bill also protects 4-H and Future Farmers of America (FFA) programs. Under the bill, local governments are banned from zoning changes that make it harder for 4-H and FFA programs to operate. Schools can now classify on-campus barns and gardens as “agricultural,” shielding student livestock projects from zoning disputes and even providing scholarships for FFA dues.

    And a bill provision called “Florida Farmer Financial Protection Act” bars lenders from denying credit to producers because of environmental, social or governance (ESG) standards and lets farmers sue if they suspect discrimination.

    Anthony DiMarco, executive vice-president of government relations at the Florida Bankers Association, was reported to have objected to the provision, saying it would increase lawsuits against lenders, bar banks from cutting ties with high-risk clients such as medical-marijuana firms and encourage other industries to demand the same legal weapon.

    With fluoride on its way out, labels changing, drones grounded and lenders on notice, Florida’s farm bill is redrawing the state’s agricultural landscape — leaving dentists, plant-based brands and bankers bracing for what comes next.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • ‘They got these vultures down here’: St. Louis resident accuses disaster investors of swarming decimated West End neighborhood after deadly tornado — how to protect yourself after a disaster

    ‘They got these vultures down here’: St. Louis resident accuses disaster investors of swarming decimated West End neighborhood after deadly tornado — how to protect yourself after a disaster

    Piles of bricks and debris lined the streets and sidewalks of the West End neighborhood in St. Louis after tornadoes ripped through the area on May 16, killing at least five people and damaging thousands of homes and businesses.

    For longtime resident Bobbie White, the destruction was devastating. Her home was severely damaged, and she says her son’s house, just a block away, was left without a kitchen or bathroom after the back of the structure was torn off.

    “My house was destroyed. My son’s house was destroyed,” she told First Alert 4 in a story published May 23.

    Amid the community-led cleanup efforts and volunteer support, White says opportunists came circling.

    Don’t miss

    “They got these vultures down here, talking about ‘Do you want to sell? Do you want to sell?’ I let them know: If I don’t send for you, don’t you come for me,” she said. “Licking your chops thinking you’re getting prime property for pennies on the dollar. That isn’t going to happen.”

    Who are these types of buyers, and how can homeowners protect themselves in these situations if they’re asked to sell?

    How the city is helping residents

    St. Louis Mayor Cara Spencer says officials are working toward tackling such buying practices, according to the local broadcaster. One action the city has taken is to pause real estate tax sales and what Spencer called “land grabs.”

    Still, homeowners may feel pressure to sell from so-called disaster investors. For those without adequate insurance — or who simply don’t want to rebuild — the offer of fast cash can be tempting, even if it’s far less than their property is worth.

    Disaster investors are individuals or companies that purchase destroyed or damaged properties at discounted prices with the goal of salvaging them or flipping them for a profit. Some investors may claim they’re helping to rebuild devastated communities by assuming the financial risk of buying damaged properties, while critics call them exploitative.

    Meanwhile, Central West End resident Ali Rand has created a grassroots movement to recruit volunteers and raise money to help St. Louis homeowners, according to First Alert 4.

    “I’m going to do whatever it takes for it to stay my neighborhood and for my neighbors to stay here. Without them, what will happen to the City of St. Louis? That is my biggest fear. I cannot have the city fail,” Rand told the broadcaster.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    What to do if you’re approached by a disaster investor

    If someone offers to buy your home after a natural disaster, don’t rush into a deal — even if the offer sounds appealing. Here are a few things to consider first:

    • Check your insurance: If your home is insured, your payout could cover repairs or even rebuilding (up to a policy limit).
    • Don’t accept the first offer: In the wake of a disaster, you may initially get a lowball offer for your property. If you plan to sell, get a second opinion from a local real estate agent.
    • Ask questions: What is the buyer’s plan for the property? Are they offering a fair price for the land value alone? If you’re unsure, consult with a housing counselor.
    • Look into grants or relief programs: Government aid may be available to help cover temporary housing or emergency repairs.
    • Consider your long-term goals: Selling for a quick payout may solve today’s crisis, but it could hurt your finances down the line.

    As St. Louis works on recovery, residents like White and Rand are doing everything they can to fix their homes and protect their community.

    “I will rebuild," White said firmly. “I haven’t worked 51 years for nothing.”

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • Canadian man gets 2.5 years in prison for ‘elaborate scheme’ using his mother’s identity to steal more than $420,000 from Social Security over 30 years. But how common is this, actually?

    Canadian man gets 2.5 years in prison for ‘elaborate scheme’ using his mother’s identity to steal more than $420,000 from Social Security over 30 years. But how common is this, actually?

    A Canadian man has been arrested, sentenced to two-and-a-half years in prison and ordered to repay $420,000 he stole in Social Security benefits over a 30-year period, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Alaska said in a news release May 12.

    Ellis Kingsep, 77, was legally living in the U.S. and used an "elaborate scheme" to collect Social Security benefits intended for his mother, the office says. His mother would now be 103 years old, but no records of her exist past 1993 and she’s presumed dead.

    Don’t miss

    As President Donald Trump has pushed to uncover what he called "shocking levels of incompetence and probable fraud" in Social Security, this situation highlights concerns about how long-term fraud can slip through the cracks, especially when beneficiaries die and no one reports it.

    How did Kingsep keep receiving payments?

    Kingsep’s fraud, the office says, relied on a complex system of mail forwarding that helped him receive and send mail in his mother’s name. Citing court documents, it says he used multiple private mailbox accounts in California, Vancouver and Alaska to intercept and reroute mail.

    It’s estimated the scheme was devised in 1995 and continued undetected until 2023, when a federal investigator uncovered the deception. At this point, the payments were stopped.

    Kingsep was arrested in July 2024 and in December pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud. In addition to the prison sentence and restitution, the court also imposed a $50,000 criminal fine and ordered him to serve three years of supervised release following his incarceration.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    How common is Social Security fraud?

    Since taking office in January 2025, Trump has repeatedly made unverified claims about widespread fraud in the Social Security system. During a joint session of Congress, Trump claimed,

    "1.3 million people from ages 150 to 159 and over 130,000 people, according to the Social Security databases, are age over 160 years old." He even said that one person was listed as being 360 years old.

    While the numbers sound alarming, these statements reflect a misunderstanding of the data rather than actual fraud. Millions of people in the Social Security database appear to be over 100, but that’s largely because they died before death records were digitized, and their deaths were never formally recorded. Nearly all of those individuals are no longer receiving benefits. In fact, the Social Security Administration (SSA) reports that just 0.1% of Social Security retirement beneficiaries are over the age of 100. SSA policy also halts payments for beneficiaries over the age of 115.

    In terms of financial errors, the SSA’s Office of the Inspector General reported nearly $72 billion in improper payments in 2024. But that number included overpayments and underpayments to beneficiaries.

    The Inspector General’s office has made several recommendations to improve payment accuracy, though many remained to be implemented as of August. Still, fraud itself appears to be rare. Kathleen Romig, Director of Social Security and Disability Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, noted that Social Security maintains a payment accuracy rate of nearly 99%.

    The Kingsep case is a rare example, but it highlights the importance of keeping records up to date. When a loved one who receives benefits passes away, the funeral home usually notifies the SSA. If no funeral home is involved, you can report the death directly by calling 1-800-772-1213.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • ‘He’s been sitting on them letting them crumble’: St. Louis looks to buy vacant properties from developer — how property buyouts could affect real estate markets and your home’s value

    After years of stalled promises and crumbling properties, St. Louis officials are taking matters into their own hands.

    The city of St. Louis is looking to purchase more than 100 vacant properties on the city’s north side, most of which are owned by Paul McKee’s Northside Regeneration LLC. But according to 5 On Your Side that wishful thinking is turning into a nightmare.

    Don’t miss

    According to the Northside Regeneration website, the company planned "a large-scale and holistic transformation of a two-square-mile section of north St. Louis City." It claimed the development would create 43,000 construction jobs and 22,000 permanent jobs. Internet archives show that the Northside Regeneration project has been in the works since at least 2009, but city officials say the developer has failed to follow through on those promises.

    Alderman Rasheen Aldridge, who represents Ward 14, emphasized the long history of stalled development in the area and the frustration it has caused residents.

    "Paul McKee isn’t somebody that just popped up on the scene,” he told reporters. “This has been a man who has been buying property in my neighborhood since I was a kid and hasn’t done anything with it. He’s been sitting on them letting them crumble."

    Aldridge added the failed development plan is not just about unrealized dreams — leaving the properties vacant also puts residents at risk.

    What is the city’s plan?

    Last year, St. Louis Mayor Tihsaura Jones signed a bill to allow economic redevelopment in the area.

    The St. Louis Development Corporation (SLDC), working through the Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority, has begun efforts to reclaim these properties through a buyout process.

    Over the past two months, the city has sent offers to purchase 146 properties, with the first round including 87 properties and the second round adding another 59. Officials are collectively offering over $1 million for the properties, giving owners 60 days to accept or reject the offer.

    If property owners refuse, the city may use eminent domain to purchase the undeveloped properties. Either way, Aldridge sees it as a win for St. Louis residents.

    "To have a process where we can get some of these beautiful brick buildings in north St. Louis either rehabbed and some that can’t be demolished and figure out what is the next step, I think is a huge positive thing," Aldridge said.

    According to 5 On Your Side, the city’s plan also includes 59 properties in Jeff-Vander-Lou and St. Louis Place.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    How could this impact local home values?

    For homeowners in north St. Louis, the city’s buyout plan could significantly impact property values. Renovating long-neglected properties and introducing new developments could help stabilize or increase home values by improving the area and bringing jobs.

    Vacant buildings often contribute to crime, lower demand and declining property values — issues the city hopes to address with this initiative.

    However, some residents are concerned about gentrification. If redevelopment leads to high-end housing or commercial projects, long-time residents could face rising property taxes and increased living costs, potentially pricing them out of their own neighbourhood.

    The city’s plan is a major step in St. Louis’ broader efforts to revitalize the north side, but, officials have yet to disclose specific redevelopment plans. The city is engaging residents through community meetings and collaborative neighborhood planning.

    “These neighborhood plans will help to proactively guide development that benefits all of our residents and community members,” said Don Roe, executive director of the City’s Planning & Urban Design Agency.

    Whether the city’s buyout effort will succeed remains to be seen. For now, homeowners and residents in north St. Louis are watching closely, hoping this initiative leads to meaningful change after decades of broken revitalization promises.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • My dad just died and I found out he cut all 3 of his other kids out of his will for ‘betraying’ him — I feel guilty keeping everything and my siblings are furious. What should I do?

    The death of a loved one can be devastating for a family, but when a disputed will quickly follows the funeral, the grieving process often turns into a bitter dispute.

    Case in point: the Levitt family. Caroline Levitt, a 29-year-old woman who is grieving the loss of her father, has been grappling with backlash from her three older siblings after learning she was the sole beneficiary of their father’s estate.

    Don’t miss

    After years of being the only child to maintain contact and care for their aging, emotionally distant dad, Caroline was stunned to discover her father had left her everything: the house, the car and over $300,000 in savings.

    Her siblings assumed she’d divide the estate equally, but when Caroline refused, she found out why her siblings had lost contact with their dad. One had borrowed money from him and never repaid it. Another cut the father off when dad refused to co-sign a loan, and the third forged their dad’s signature on an insurance document.

    One sibling has hinted at taking legal action to get their fair share, but dropped that idea after seeing the paperwork. Now, Caroline’s caught between guilt and loyalty, wondering if honoring her dad’s final decision makes her selfish.

    Should Caroline share the inheritance?

    There are two things for Caroline to consider here — one legal and one ethical. Legally, if someone leaves behind a valid will, that document typically determines who inherits what. And since the father updated his will and named his youngest daughter as the sole beneficiary, the law is likely on Caroline’s side.

    There are a few cases where wills can be contested, which can vary by state. In general, a will can be contested if:

    • The person who passed away lacked the mental capacity to sign the will. For example, if they were very ill or suffered from dementia when the will was signed.

    • The person was under duress or tricked into signing the will — for example, if they thought they were signing a different document.

    • There is suspicion that the signature was forged.

    • Another will exists, especially if the other will is newer. In most cases, the most recent will is the only one that is valid.

    Based on the siblings dropping the idea of legal action after seeing the paperwork, Caroline is likely in the clear, legally speaking. However, it’s always a good idea to consult with an estate or probate lawyer to cover your bases when an inheritance is questioned.

    Now for the ethical side: should Caroline share her inheritance because it’s the right thing to do? While this is a personal decision, try putting yourself in her father’s shoes — say you wrote a will leaving your favorite niece your estate and left out her brother, who was rude and even stole money from you. Would you want your nephew to get a share of your estate? Probably not.

    Caroline’s father made his final wishes clear, and she can honor his wishes by simply following them. Of course, Caroline must consider what keeping the inheritance will do to her relationship with her siblings. If she refuses to share the inheritance, Caroline’s relationship with her siblings will likely be strained, if not completely severed. That is a tough decision that only she can make.

    It’s also worth considering the financial implications of Caroline splitting the inheritance. To split the value of the house and car, she’ll need to sell these items. Depending on Caroline’s current living situation, she may decide that living in the inherited house is what’s best for her financially.

    As you can see, there’s a lot for Caroline to consider as she mulls over what to do with her inheritance.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    How to navigate finances after an inheritance

    Coming into an unexpected inheritance, especially one tied to complicated family dynamics, can be emotionally draining. But it’s important to take a step back and approach the financial side with a clear head. Here’s how to navigate the financial side of an inheritance.

    Wait before making big financial decisions

    The first rule of inheritance planning? Don’t rush. Wait a few months before making any major decisions, like quitting your job, investing a large sum or giving money to others. Emotions can cloud judgment, and grief can lead to impulse spending.

    Secure the funds and understand what you’ve inherited

    Before you do anything else, make sure the estate has cleared probate and that you legally have access to the funds and/or property. Also, check for any unpaid debts or taxes attached to the estate. In most cases, the estate, not the beneficiary, is responsible for those, but it’s important to confirm.

    Once the estate is settled, consider placing the money in a high-yield savings account or a short-term certificate of deposit (CD).

    Talk to a financial advisor or tax professional

    Inheritances can come with unexpected tax implications, especially if they include investment accounts or rental property. An advisor can help you reduce your tax burden and make a plan for the funds. Look for a fiduciary financial advisor — someone legally required to act in your best interest.

    Decide what to do with inherited property

    If you’ve inherited a home, you’ll need to decide whether you want to live in it, rent it or sell it. Consider the cost of taxes and maintaining the home. Home insurance rates are on the rise, and all of these costs might set you back more than you realize.

    There’s also the emotional aspect to consider — if you have good memories, you might want to keep the home. But if you have negative feelings about the house, or maybe its location, it might make sense to sell.

    Set boundaries with family

    If other relatives feel they were “cut out” of the estate, tensions can rise. You may be under no legal obligation to share the inheritance, but if you choose to, do it intentionally and not out of guilt. Set clear boundaries about what you are or aren’t willing to give, and avoid getting pressured into giving more than you’re comfortable with.

    Inherited money can be a powerful tool for reaching financial goals — if you manage it wisely. Take your time, get expert advice and make choices that support your long-term goals.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • ‘I can’t open my window’: Houston tenants file 30 health department violations after living for weeks with stench of overflowing garbage bins, no AC or hot water — how things got so bad

    ‘I can’t open my window’: Houston tenants file 30 health department violations after living for weeks with stench of overflowing garbage bins, no AC or hot water — how things got so bad

    Residents of the Westbury Reserve Apartments in southwest Houston are finally seeing some relief after weeks of dealing with the stench of uncollected garbage, no hot water and no air conditioning.

    "I can’t open my window. I come out here every day, especially with that rain. You know how that smells,” resident Bernard Joseph told Fox 26. “They ain’t dumped the trash in two months."

    Don’t miss

    But that wasn’t the only concern. Tenants said squatters were breaking into vacant units, sewage was backing up into buildings and basic maintenance was nonexistent. Some residents said the issues have been occurring since Christmas.

    After weeks of pressure and nearly 30 health department violations, the property owner stepped in with promises of cleanup and change. But how it got this bad is a tangled story.

    ‘The buck stops with me’

    Robert Ritzenhaler, owner of Westbury Reserve and CEO of REM Capital, blamed the severe neglect on AMC Management, the third-party property management company he hired.

    "At the end of the day, the buck stops with me, as one of the owners of the property,” he told Fox 26. “That doesn’t mean there isn’t a story behind it, of course.”

    Ritzenhaler said he was shocked to learn a $10,000 trash bill had not been paid, despite more than $366,000 reportedly sitting in the property’s account. According to him, AMC requested approval to pay the trash bill only a month ago. He signed off, but said AMC’s payment process caused a delay.

    “I shouldn’t have to approve a trash bill,” Ritzenhaler said. “The contract specifically states that they will take care of managing the property and keeping it habitable.”

    AMC Management disputed that version of events. In a statement to FOX 26, the company said, “AMC never sought permission to pay trash collection bills … nor was it required to under the property management agreement."

    Instead, AMC claims REM Capital failed to provide funds to pay contractors and even fell behind on payroll and management fees. AMC sent a termination letter, which took effect May 1.

    Ritzenhaler has since dispatched a new team member to oversee a full-scale cleanup and repairs effort. Top priorities included clearing trash piles, boarding up broken windows, resolving sewage backups, restoring hot water and tackling pest problems.

    He’s also working to fix or replace broken gates, potholes and expired fire extinguishers. The pool area — described by the fire marshal as “unacceptable” — must also be brought back to code.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    What to do if you’re caught in the middle

    Tenants at Westbury Reserve say they were left in the dark for months, unsure who was responsible and with no clear way to get help. If you ever find yourself in a similar situation, here are some steps that can help:

    Document everything

    Take photos and videos of the conditions in your unit and around the property. Keep records of rent payments, maintenance requests and any communication with management.

    Contact property management and owners

    Make sure the property managers understand the extent of the issues. If they aren’t responding, try reaching out to the property owner directly. Public property records or business filings can help you track them down.

    File complaints with authorities

    You can file complaints with housing authorities, the health department and sanitation services. In Houston, this includes Solid Waste Management and the Department of Neighborhoods.

    Seek legal aid

    Nonprofits like Lone Star Legal Aid in Texas offer free or low-cost legal help if you believe your rights as a tenant are being violated.

    Finally, consider contacting local media. Residents at Westbury Reserve only got results after a news station picked up their story. Sometimes, public pressure is the only way to spark action.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • Florida firefighters rushed to evacuate 60 residents from high-rise after a massive crack was spotted in one of its columns — why the state still faces safety challenges post-Surfside

    Florida firefighters rushed to evacuate 60 residents from high-rise after a massive crack was spotted in one of its columns — why the state still faces safety challenges post-Surfside

    In early May, construction crews working in the parking garage of South Beach III Condominiums in Clearwater, Florida, spotted a "several‑foot‑wide crack” in a concrete support pillar.

    As CBS News reports, they immediately flagged the structural concern, eager to prevent another tragedy like the 2021 condo collapse in Surfside, Florida, which killed 98 people.

    Within two hours, firefighters were knocking on doors in the 12‑story tower, hustling roughly  60 residents onto the street with what they could carry.

    Don’t miss

    “Basically for like two days [I’m] wearing the same clothes until things kind of calmed down,” resident Scott  May told FOX 13.

    A week later, engineers installed heavy shoring and declared the column stabilized. Most condo owners were allowed to return to their units — but not those with condos stacked over the column. They were left in limbo.

    Even the homeowners who could return had to agree to restrictions: no construction or remodeling without written board approval, no deliveries over 75 pounds, and closed balconies above the damaged pillar.

    It’s the latest example of how post-Surfside safety legislation is impacting condo residents..

    The impact of Surfside: How one tragedy rewrote Florida laws

    When the Champlain Towers South condominium crumbled in Surfside in 2021, it exposed decades‑old gaps in Florida’s building‑safety oversight.

    In 2022, lawmakers passed Senate Bill 4-D, also known as the milestone-inspection law. Key points include:

    • Mandatory structural reviews: Every condo of three or more stories must undergo a ‘milestone inspection’ by an architect or engineer 30 years after completion, or 25 years if it sits within three miles of the coastline, followed by re‑inspections every 10 years.
    • No more reserve waivers: Associations must fully fund reserves for major repairs. Board members who skip or defer funding face personal liability.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    The new rules have already shuttered several condo towers for several years. One high‑profile case is Miami Beach’s Castle  Beach  Club condominum — in which the onsite spa (Russian & Turkish Baths) was forced to close for structural repairs in 2022.

    The spa finally reopened after a three-year shutdown that kept portions of the 570-unit building off-limits and saddled owners with steep special assessments.

    The U.S. Sun reports that the monthly dues tripled at Winter  Park  Woods near Orlando after the HOA board rushed to meet the new reserve rules under the law.

    One condo owner’s monthly HOA fees jumped from $634 to more than $2,100. Some longtime owners were pushed toward foreclosure or fire‑sale listings.

    State officials like Rep. Vicki Lopez, who sponsored the bill, insist the cost is worth it.

    "We have strived to reach that delicate balance between the safety of our constituents that live in condominiums, as well as understanding the incredible financial impact that sometimes these particular bills that we pass have,” she told WESH News.

    What to do if you’re evacuated for structural issues

    While you can’t anticipate being forced to evacuate your home for structural reasons, it’s good to have a grounding in the steps to take to make the disruption easier to navigate.

    Here’s what to do if you’re forced to leave your home:

    • Get documentation. Get, in writing, the official word on why the building is off limits and how long engineers expect repairs to take. Under Florida’s condo law, the condo board must share safety findings with owners and tenants upon request.
    • Call your insurance company. Next, contact your homeowners’ insurance company. A standard condo policy often includes Loss‑of‑Use (Additional Living Expense) coverage to reimburse your hotel bills, short‑term rentals and even the cost of boarding pets while your unit is uninhabitable. Make sure to save receipts for boarding, hotel, and food, as your insurance may require these for reimbursement.
    • Talk to your lender. Unfortunately, being evacuated from your condo won’t halt your mortgage payments. Contact your lender and inquire about a short-term forbearance or other options that may help you cover the costs of alternative accommodations while repairs are being made. Depending on its policies, you may be able to skip a few months of payments and tack them on to the end of the mortgage term.
    • Look for government assistance. Look for programs at the city or county level as federal support may be limited. For example, programs like FEMA generally won’t help, as grants require the federal government to declare a disaster and typically exclude defects discovered before a collapse or storm.
    • Document, document, document. If possible, request limited access to your condo to photograph valuables and gather documents, then back up those photos to the cloud. Insurers and lenders may demand proof of condition later. Keep every email, notice, and receipt related to the disruption in one folder — special assessments, hotel invoices, even Uber rides — because you will need those when you file insurance claims, request fee waivers or seek tax relief.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • This Houston man built 1 big house on land bought by his great-grandma in the 1800s — now he and his sisters all live together happily. Should more American families do the same?

    This Houston man built 1 big house on land bought by his great-grandma in the 1800s — now he and his sisters all live together happily. Should more American families do the same?

    When Reggie Van Lee’s great-grandmother, a Black woman, bought a plot of land near Houston in 1899, she likely couldn’t have imagined the home that would sit on it.

    In 2012, Lee, a Harvard graduate, former Alvin Ailey dancer and current Houston Consulting Executive, built a massive 20,000-square-foot house on the plot of land with a great room, beauty salon, chapel and even a helicopter pad.

    Don’t miss

    But the home isn’t just for him — today. He lives there with his three sisters and even some of their spouses. Lee thinks togetherness is important, especially during a time when so much is uncertain.

    "I built this house not just for my immediate family, but for my extended family, including friends," Lee explained to Fox 26 News reporter Damali Keith.

    Can several generations and members of the family live together in harmony?

    How do they all get along?

    Lee said the house is large enough to have space for everyone to spread out and get together when they want. The master suite, for example, is on a separate side of the house.

    "The house is large enough, so when you really want to be by yourself, you can. When you want to be with others, you can as well,” Lee said. “Having dinners together, family dinners together. It’s just amazing."

    The home is large, but Lee added that they all use the space. Last year, they hosted a 300-person wedding for his now 77-year-old sister, who was getting remarried. They also hosted a party to commemorate the 125th anniversary of his great-grandmother purchasing the land.

    But what happens to the family home when Lee is gone? He hopes it will stay in the family and has made provisions in his will to keep it as a family home or donate the home and the property.

    "I want very much for this land and this house to stay in the family. In my will, it says if no family member lives in the house, the house actually goes to the Texas Historical Society. It’s not going to be a situation where Uncle Reggie dies, they sell everything, and split the money,” Lee said. “Especially in these times where there are so many forces of evil against us as people and against people coming together in love as opposed to being divisive, I think families should be the ones to send that message of togetherness."

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    Should more Americans live with extended families?

    According to 2022 U.S. Census, approximately 4.8 million households in the country are multigenerational, meaning they include at least three generations living together. While data on extended family households — those with aunts, uncles or cousins — is harder to track in the U.S. But it’s certainly commonplace in other parts of the world.

    A Pew Research study reported that extended family households are the most common type of households worldwide, with 38% of people living with extended family. Nearly half of people in the Asia-Pacific area live with extended family, while only 11% of North Americans do.

    But should multigenerational and extended family living be more common in the U.S.? Beyond emotional benefits, this arrangement offers practical and financial advantages.

    Rising home prices make it a smart financial move

    Housing costs in the US. are skyrocketing. According to Zillow, the average home price is now over $355,000 — an increase of 2.7% from last year. Living with extended family can help households share expenses and reduce financial stress. Additionally, purchasing a home rather than Purchasing a home, rather than renting, can also help families build generational wealth.

    More child and elder care options

    Childcare is one of the biggest expenses for American families. According to ChildCare Aware, a nonprofit supporting the U.S. childcare system, the average annual cost of childcare in 2023 was $11,582. For families with multiple children, this expense can exceed the annual earnings of one parent.

    Elder care is similarly costly. A home health aide averages $6,292 per month, making in-home care financially challenging for many families. Living with extended family provides an alternative to expensive childcare or elder care while fostering a stronger family support system.

    Improved financial security

    Pooling resources in a multigenerational household can provide a financial cushion. With multiple incomes contributing to household expenses, families may be able to pay off debt, save more or invest more in long-term financial goals. This setup also offers stability during financial hardships, such as job losses or unexpected home repairs.

    As more families face financial uncertainty and work-life balance challenges, multigenerational living may grow in popularity. For people like Lee, it’s not just a practical choice — it’s about preserving family bonds and creating a lasting legacy.

    "At the end of the day, all we really have is family,” Lee said. “Too many people — Black people in particular — have given up family land."

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

  • ‘A betrayal of the badge’: Florida police captain one of 11 indicted in alarming years-long VA disability fraud scheme — here’s how insiders faked injuries to steal from US veterans program

    A Haines City police captain is among 11 people indicted in a scheme to defraud Veterans Affairs (VA), according to reporting from FOX 13.

    Captain Gabriel Garcia, who has served with the department since 2007, is accused of fraudulently obtaining a 100% VA disability rating through a years-long scheme orchestrated by allegedly corrupt VA employees.

    Don’t miss

    According to the VA, a veteran with a 100% disability rating would receive $3,831.30 per month, with additional payments for each dependent spouse, parent and child under the age of 18.

    Federal prosecutors say the scheme, which ran from 2020 to 2025, was orchestrated by Ángel Carrer-Rivera, a now former VA employee in Puerto Rico, and Richard Rivera-Maitin, a veteran and auto shop owner.

    How the VA fraud scheme went down

    Carrer-Rivera allegedly abused his access to the Veterans Benefits Management System to route claims from the defendants to employees he supervised. Those claims had reportedly been prepped with false medical conditions.

    Meanwhile, Rivera-Maitin allegedly coached veterans on what symptoms to claim at doctor’s appointments and charged fees in exchange for helping secure disability ratings. The group created fraudulent claims for lifetime benefits to be submitted and approved, resulting in what officials called a “substantial financial loss” to the United States.

    Other defendants in the case include a Department of Homeland Security officer, a flight attendant, Garcia’s mother and other veterans and their spouses. Following Garcia’s arrest, Haines City Police Chief Jay Hopwood released this statement:

    "The conduct that led to this arrest is a betrayal of the badge and everything this department stands for. We will not tolerate dishonor in our ranks and will continue holding ourselves to the highest standards of integrity and accountability."

    According to the United States Attorney’s Office, the defendants in this case could face up to five years in prison for conspiracy to defraud the United States and up to 20 years for "substantive and conspiracy mail and wire fraud counts," Fox 13 reports.

    Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

    How common is VA fraud — and what’s being done about it?

    Unfortunately, the Haines City case isn’t an isolated incident. VA benefit fraud is a persistent and growing problem, with schemes ranging from exaggerated disability claims to predatory practices by unaccredited advisors. With the VA disbursing more than $135 billion annually in benefits, the system has become an appealing target for scammers.

    According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), veterans reported $292 million in losses due to fraud in 2022. This number includes all scam types — not just benefits fraud — but highlights how aggressively veterans are being targeted.

    Some of the more common VA scams include:

    • Veterans falsely claiming or exaggerating disabilities, like in the Garcia case.

    • So-called “claim sharks” — unaccredited “advisors” who charge veterans fees for services that are otherwise free through the VA.

    • Promises to “speed up” applications or guarantee a 100% disability rating, which only the VA can legally determine.

    Experts say expansions to VA benefits signed in 2022 — including those tied to toxic exposure and burn pit smoke inhalation — may be fueling fraud attempts by expanding eligibility and creating more opportunities for abuse.

    The VA has taken several steps to combat fraud. The 2017 "Seek to Prevent Fraud, Waste and Abuse” program aimed to centralize and strengthen fraud prevention efforts across the VA. More recently, in 2024, the VA and the White House launched VSAFE.gov, a platform providing veterans with resources to identify and report scams.

    President Trump also signed an executive order to improve accountability and whistleblower protection within the VA, establishing an office dedicated to these efforts. However, later proposals to cut tens of thousands of VA employees have raised concerns among veteran advocates, who say reducing staff could make it harder to investigate and prevent fraud.

    VA Secretary Doug Collins recently reassured veterans that the agency is reinforcing, not cutting, essential services and urged veterans to seek information directly from VA, not third-party claims companies.

    As this case shows, fraudulent claims not only steal taxpayer money but also threaten public trust in a system meant to help those who served our country.

    What to read next

    Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free.

    This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.